Pneumatic muscles with similar characteristics to biological muscles have been widely used in robots, and thus are promising drivers for frog inspired robots. However, the application and nonlinearity of the pneumatic system limit the advance. On the basis of the swimming mechanism of the frog, a frog-inspired robot based on pneumatic muscles is developed. To realize the independent tasks by the robot, a pneumatic system with internal chambers, micro air pump, and valves is implemented. The micro pump is used to maintain the pressure difference between the source and exhaust chambers. The pneumatic muscles are controlled by high-speed switch valves which can reduce the robot cost, volume, and mass. A dynamic model of the pneumatic system is established for the simulation to estimate the system, including the chamber, muscle, and pneumatic circuit models. The robot design is verified by the robot swimming experiments and the dynamic model is verified through the experiments and simulations of the pneumatic system. The simulation results are compared to analyze the functions of the source pressure, internal volume of the muscle, and circuit flow rate which is proved the main factor that limits the response of muscle pressure. The proposed research provides the application of the pneumatic muscles in the frog inspired robot and the pneumatic model to study muscle controller.
Pneumatic muscles with similar characteristics to biological muscles have been widely used in robots, and thus are promising drivers for frog inspired robots. However, the application and nonlinearity of the pneumatic system limit the advance. On the basis of the swimming mechanism of the frog, a frog-inspired robot based on pneumatic muscles is developed. To realize the independent tasks by the robot, a pneumatic system with internal chambers, micro air pump, and valves is implemented. The micro pump is used to maintain the pressure difference between the source and exhaust chambers. The pneumatic muscles are controlled by high-speed switch valves which can reduce the robot cost, volume, and mass. A dynamic model of the pneumatic system is established for the simulation to estimate the system, including the chamber, muscle, and pneumatic circuit models. The robot design is verified by the robot swimming experiments and the dynamic model is verified through the experiments and simulations of the pneumatic system. The simulation results are compared to analyze the functions of the source pressure, internal volume of the muscle, and circuit flow rate which is proved the main factor that limits the response of muscle pressure. The proposed research provides the application of the pneumatic muscles in the frog inspired robot and the pneumatic model to study muscle controller.
1. Z J Yu, Z Q Zheng, X G Yang, et al. Dynamic analysis of propulsion mechanism directly driven by wave energy for marine mobile buoy. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(4):710-715.
2. B Tondu, P Lopez. The McKibben muscle and its use in actuating robot-arms showing similarities with human arm behavior. Industrial Robot, 1997, 24(6):432-439.
3. J Guo. Optimal measurement strategies for target tracking by a biomimetic underwater vehicle. Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35(5):473-483.
4. Y L Hou, X Z Hu, D X Zeng, et al. Biomimetic shoulder complex based on 3-pss/s spherical parallel mechanism. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 28(1):29-37.
5. Y W Wang, Z L Wang, Jian Li. Research development and tendency of biomimetic robot fish. Machine Design and Research, 2011, 27(2):22-25, 32.
6. M S Triantafyllou, G S Triantafyllou. An efficient swimming machine. Scientific American, 1995, 272(3):64-71.
7. C zhou, M Tan, Z Q Cao. Kinematic modeling of a bio-inspired robotic fish. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 19-23, 2008:695-699.
8. L Shi, S X Guo, S L Mao, et al. Development of a lobsterinspired underwater micro robot. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2013, 10(1):257-271.
9. J Ayers. Underwater walking. Arthropod structure & development, 2004, 33(3):347-360.
10. A P Thomas, M Milano, K Fischer, et al. Synthetic jet propulsion for small underwater vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Barcelona, Spain, April 18-22, 2005:181-187.
11. P V Alvarado, S Chin, W Larson. A soft body under-actuated approach to multi degree of freedom biomimetic robots:A stingray example. Proceedings of the 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Tokyo, Japan, September 26-29, 2010:473-478.
12. M Wang, X Z Zang, J Z Fan, et al. Biological jumping mechanism analysis and modeling for frog robot. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5:181-188.
13. J M Gal, R W Blake. Biomechanics of frog swimming:I. estimation of the propulsive force generated by Hymenochirus boettgeri. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1988, 138(1):399-411.
14. C T Richards. Kinematics and hydrodynamics analysis of swimming anurans reveals striking inter-specific differences in the mechanism for producing thrust. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2010, 213(4):621-634.
15. S Nauwelaerts, P Aerts, K D'août. Speed modulation in swimming frogs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2001, 33(3):265-272.
16. J Pandey, N S Reddy, R Ray, et al. Biological swimming mechanism analysis and design of robotic frog. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Takamatsu, Japan, August 4-7, 2013:1726-1731.
17. D A Núñez-Altamirano, I Juárez-Campos, L Márquez-Pérez, et al. Description of a propulsion unit used in guiding a walking machine by recognizing a three-point bordered path. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 20(6):1157-1166.
18. J T Lei, H Y Yu, T M Wang. Dynamic bending of bionic flexible body driven by pneumatic artificial muscles(PAMs) for spinning gait of quadruped robot. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(1):11-20.
19. V T Jouppila, S A Gadsden, G M Bone. Sliding mode control of a pneumatic muscle actuator system with a PWM strategy. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2014, 15(1):19-31.
20. H P Ren, J T Fan. Adaptive backstepping slide mode control of pneumatic position servo system. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(5):1003-1009.
21. G L Shi, W Shen. Hybrid control of a parallel platform based on pneumatic artificial muscles combining sliding mode controller and adaptive fuzzy CMAC. Control Engineering Practice, 2013, 21:76-86.
22. M Sorli, L Gastaldi, E Codina, et al. Dynamic analysis of pneumatic actuators. Simul. Pract. Theory, 1999:589-602.
23. A Ilchmann, O Sawodny, S Trenn. Pneumatic cylinders:modelling and feed-back force-control, International Journal of Control, 2006, 79(6):365-78.
24. H Ali, S Noor, S M Bashi, et al. A review of pneumatic actuators (modeling and control). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2009, 3(2):440-454.
25. Y Chen, J F Zhang, C J Yang, et al. Design and hybrid control of the pneumatic force-feedback systems for Arm-Exoskeleton by using on/off valve. Mechatronics, 2007, (17):325-335.
26. C P Chou, B Hannaford. Measurement and modeling of Mckibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1996, 12(1):90-102.
27. B S Kang, C S Kothera, B K S Woods, et al. Dynamic modeling of mckibben pneumatic artificial muscles for antagonistic actuation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, May 12-17, 2009:182-187.
28. Y P Ju, H Liu, Z Y Yao, et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis and lifetime estimation of a natural gas pipeline centrifugal compressor under near-choke and near-surge conditions. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 28(6):1261-1268.
29. Ž Šitum, P Trslić, D Trivić, et al. Pneumatic muscle actuators within robotic and mechatronic systems. Proceedings of International Conference Fluid Power, Maribor, Slovenija, September 17-18, 2015:175-188.
30. I Veneva, B Vanderborght, D Lefeber, et al. Propulsion system with pneumatic artificial muscles for powering ankle-foot orthosis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2013, 43(4):3-16.
