The magnetizing ability of excitation structureshas great influence on the detectability of magnetic flux leakage sensor.According to the method of AC magnetic leakage detection, a parametric finite element model of magnetic flux leakage detection is established. The influences of the shape and size of the magnetic yoke, the position of the exciting coil, the winding length and the thickness of the magnetic shielding layer on the detection signal are investigated. In addition, an optimization method of the size of the excitation structure is developed by combining parametric finite element analysis with genetic algorithm.The distance between the magnetic poles and the width of the magnetic pole is optimized. The simulation and test results show that the excitation structure has a great influence on the results of magnetic flux leakage testing, and the optimized magnetic excitation structure is helpful to improve the detection performance of the magnetic flux leakage sensor. The proposed optimization method provides a feasible method for improving the performance of magnetic flux leakage sensors.
CHANG Yu
,
JIAO Jingpin
,
LI Guanghai
,
HE Cunfu
,
WU Bin
. Influencesand Optimization of Excitation Structure of Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensor[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018
, 54(24)
: 7
-17
.
DOI: 10.3901/JME.2018.24.007
[1] NARA T, FUJIEDA M, GOTOH Y. Non-destructive inspection of ferromagnetic pipes based on the discrete Fourier coefficients of magnetic flux leakage[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 115(17):509-512.
[2] SUN Y, FENG B, LIU S, et al. A methodology for identifying defects in the magnetic flux leakage method and suggestions for standard specimens[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2015, 34(3):1-9.
[3] GAO Y, TIAN G Y, LI K, et al. Multiple cracks detection and visualization using magnetic flux leakage and eddy current pulsed thermography[J]. Sensors & Actuators A Physical, 2015, 234(6):269-281.
[4] LE M, LEE J, JUN J, et al. Hall sensor array based validation of estimation of crack size in metals using magnetic dipole models[J]. NDT & E International, 2013, 53(1):18-25.
[5] YANG G, ZENGZ, DENG Y, et al. 3D EC-GMR sensor system for detection of subsurface defects at steel fastener sites[J]. NDT & E International, 2012, 50(2):20-28.
[6] WU Bin, WANG Yyjue, LIU Xiucheng, et al. A novel TMR-based MFL sensor for steel wire rope inspection using the orthogonal test method[J]. Smart Materials & Structures, 2015, 24(7):75-81.
[7] BURDIN D A, CHASHIN D V, EKONOMOV N A, et al. Nonlinear magneto-electric effects in ferromagnetic-piezoelectric composites[J]. Journal of Magnetism & Magnetic Materials, 2014, 359(5):98-104.
[8] SINGH W S, RAO B P, MUKHOPADHYAY C K, et al. Detection of localized damage in water wall tubes of thermal power plants using GMR sensor array based magnetic flux leakage technique[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2015, 34(3):1-7.
[9] SINGH W S, RAO B P C, MUKHOPADHYAY C K, et al. Finite element model-based approach for magnetic flux leakage testing of steel plates using 2D tandem GMR array sensors[J]. Insight Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2014, 56(56):683-690.
[10] PARK G S, PARK E S. Improvement of the sensor system in magnetic flux leakage-type nondestructive testing (NDT)[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2002, 38(2):1277-1280.
[11] KARUPPASAMY P, ABUDHAHIR A, PRABHAKARAN M, et al. Model-based optimization of mfl testing of ferromagnetic steam generator tubes[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2016, 35(1):1-9.
[12] ZHANG Tao, TIAN Guiyun, ZOU Xianzhang. Pulsed magnetic flux leakage sensor systems and applications[C]//Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2011 IEEE, 2011:1-6.
[13] CHENG W. Nondestructive testing of back-side local wall-thinning by means of low strength magnetization and highly sensitive magneto-impedance sensors[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2016, 16(14):1-9.
[14] JAIME A PR, SEBASTIAN RP S. Multi-objective optimization of a magnetic circuit for magnetic flux leakage-type non-destructive testing[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2016, 35(1):1-12.
[15] JIANG X, XIA Y, HU J, et al. Optimal design of mfl sensor for detecting broken steel strands in overhead power line[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2011, 121(1):301-315.
[16] 宋凯,陈超,康宜华,等. 基于U形磁轭探头的交流漏磁检测法机理研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2012, 33(9):1980-1985. SONG Kai, CHEN Chao, KANG Yihua, et al. Mechanism study of AC-MFL method using U-shape inducer[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2012, 33(9):1980-1985.
[17] 孙燕华,康宜华,石晓鹏. 基于单一轴向磁化的钢管高速漏磁检测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(10):8-13. SUN Yanhua, KANG Yihua, SHI Xiaopeng. High-speed MFL testing method for steel pipe under unidirectional axial magnetization[J]. Journal of Mechianical Engineering, 2010, 46(10):8-13.
[18] 吴德会,刘志天,苏令锌. 双传感器差分峰值侦测的漏磁检测新方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2016, 37(6):1218-1225. WU Dehui, LIU Zhitian, SU Lingxin. New MFL detection method based on differential peak extraction using dual sensors[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2016, 37(6):1218-1225.
[19] 吴德会,刘志天,王晓红,等. 利用复合激励的无盲点管道裂纹漏磁检测新方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2016, 37(10):2259-2266. WU Dehui, LIU Zhitian, WANGXiaohong, et al. Novel MFL method for pipeline crack no blind spot detection using composite excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2016, 37(10):2259-2266.
[20] 唐莺,潘孟春,罗飞路. 脉冲漏磁检测技术中传感器性能影响因素研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2010, 31(12):2875-2880. TANG Ying, PAN Mengchun, LUO Feilu. Study on effect factors of sensor performance inpulsed magnetic flux leakage testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2010, 31(12):2875-2880.
[21] FURNESS P. The magnetic fields of steel drums[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2002, 51(4):63-74.
