针对轮轨表面接触变形问题，采用不同的统计型微观固体接触模型，即Greenwood-Williamson （GW）模型，Chang-Etsion-Bogy （CEB）模型和Zhao-Maietta-Chang （ZMC）模型，研究轮轨接触表面变形特性。利用Newton-Raphson方法对微观固体接触模型公式进行求解，并同时求解间隙方程和载荷平衡方程。考虑不同粗糙度和不同塑性指数下各微观固体接触模型的压力分布情况，以及接触半径随载荷的变化情况。并将不同微观固体接触模型的结果和Hertz模型结果对比，结果表明弹塑性微观接触模型（CEB，ZMC）比弹性模型（GW）有着更小的接触压力以及更宽的接触半径，最大压力均小于最大Hertz接触压力，接触半径均大于Hertz接触半径。
In view of the wheel/rail contact surfaces deformation, based on the different statistical micro-contact models including Greenwood-Williamson(GW) model, Chang-Etsion-Bogy (CEB) model and Zhao-Maietta-Chang (ZMC) model, a wheel/rail line-contact model under dry condition is used to predict the characteristics of the wheel/rail surfaces deformation of different micro-contact models. And the formulas of micro-contact models are solved by using the Newton-Raphson method, separation formulas and force balance equation simultaneously, which obtains the pressure distribution and the contact width of different micro-contact models under the different roughness and plasticity index. Comparison of the different contact models shows that the use of elastic-plastic micro-contact models (CEB, ZMC) predict a lower maximum normal pressure and a greater contact width to the elastic model (GW). The max contact pressure of the three models is smaller than max Hertz contact pressure and the contact width is a wider range.
[1] CHEN H,BAN T,ISHIDA M. Adhesion between rail/wheel under water lubricated contact[J]. Wear,2002,253(1):75-81.
[2] CHEN H,ISHIDA M,NAKAHARA T. Analysis of Adhesion under wet conditions for three-dimensional contact considering surface roughness[J]. Wear,2005,258(7):1209-1216.
[3] ZHU YI,OLOFSSON ULF. Adhesion modeling in the wheel/rail contact under dry and lubricated conditions using measured 3D surfaces[J]. Tribology International,2013,61:1-10.
[4] 吴兵,温泽峰,王衡禹,等. 高速轮轨黏着特性影响因素研究[J]. 铁道学报,2013,35(3):18-22. WU Bing,WEN Zefeng,WANG Hengyu,et al. Study on factors affecting high-speed wheel-rail adhesion characteristics[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2013,35(3):18-22.
[5] 吴兵. 高速轮轨黏着特性数值分析[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2009. WU Bing. Numerical analysis of wheel/rail adhesion characteristics for high-speed railway[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2009.
[6] 吴兵,温泽峰,王衡禹,等. 高速轮轨水介质存在下的黏着特性数值研究[J]. 工程力学,2014,31(9):219-224. WU Bing,WEN Zefeng,WANG Hengyu,et al. Numerical study on adhesion of wheel and rail at high speed under wet condition[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2014,31(9):219-224.
[7] WU Bing,WEN Zefeng. Numerical analysis on wheel/rail adhesion under mixed contamination of oil and water with surface roughness[J]. Wear,2014,314(1):140-147.
[8] Mc COOL J I. Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces[J]. Wear,1986,107(1):37-60.
[9] LIU G,WANG Q J,LIN C. A survey of current models for simulating the contact between rough surfaces[J]. Tribology Transactions,1999,42(1):581-591.
[10] ADAMS G G,NOSONOVSKY M. Contact modeling forces[J]. Tribology International,2000,33(5):431-442.
[11] PUGLIESE G,TAVARES S M O,CIULLI E,et al. Rough contacts between actual engineering surfaces-Part Ⅱ. Contact mechanics[J]. Wear,2008,264(11):1116-1128.
[12] RENOUF M,MASSI F,FILLOT N,et al. Numerical tribology of a dry contact[J]. Tribology International,2011,44(7):834-844.
[13] GREENWOOD J A,WILLIAMSON J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series-A,1966,295(1442):300-319.
[14] GREENWOOD J A,TRIPP J H. Elastic contact of rough spheres[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics,1967,34(1):153-159.
[15] GREENWOOD J A,TRIPP J H. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces[J]. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.,1971,185(1):625-633.
[16] HISAKADO T. Effects of surfaces roughness on contact between solid surfaces[J]. Wear,1974,28(2):217-234.
[17] BUSH A W,GIBSON R D,THOMAS T R. The elastic contact of a rough surface[J]. Wear,1975,35(1):87-111.
[18] BUSH A W,GIBSON R D,KEOGH G P. Strong anisotropic rough surface[J]. ASME Journal of Tribology,1979,101(1):15-20.
[19] CHANG W R,ETSION I,BOGY D B. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Tribology-Transactions of the ASME,1987,109(2):257-263.
[20] JENG H H. An elliptic elastic-plastic asperity microcontact model for rough surfaces[J]. ASME Journal of Tribology,1998,120(1):82-88.
[21] ZHAO Y W,MAIETTA D M,CHANG L. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow[J]. Journal of Tribology,Transactions of the ASME,2000,122(1):86-93.
[22] MASJEDI M,KHONSARI M M. Film thickness and asperity load formulas for line-contact EHL with provision for surface roughness[J]. Journal of Tribology,Transactions of the ASME,2012,134(1):011503.
[23] BUSH AW,GIBSON R D,KEOGH G P. Limit of elastic deformation in contact of rough surfaces[J]. Mechanics Research Communications,1976,3(3):169-174.
[24] MCCOOL J I. Relating profile instrument measurements to the functional performance of rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Tribology,Transactions of the ASME,1987,109(2):264-270.
[25] TABOR D. The hardness of metals[M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press,1951.
[26] CHANG W R,ETSION I,BOGY D B. Friction coefficient model for metallic rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Tribology,Transactions of the ASME,1988,110(1):57-63.
[27] LIN L P,LIN J F. An elastoplastic microasperity contact model for metallic materials[J]. Journal of Tribology,Transactions of the ASME,2005,127(3):666-672.
[28] JOHNSON K L. Contact mechanics[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
[29] TIMOSHENKO S,GOODIER J N. Theory of elasticity[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,1970.
