In this study, a humanoid prototype of 2-DOF (degrees of freedom) lower limb exoskeleton is introduced to evaluate the wearable comfortable effect between person and exoskeleton. To improve the detection accuracy of the human-robot interaction torque, a BPNN (backpropagation neural networks) is proposed to estimate this interaction force and to compensate for the measurement error of the 3D-force/torque sensor. Meanwhile, the backstepping controller is designed to realize the exoskeleton's passive position control, which means that the person passively adapts to the exoskeleton. On the other hand, a variable admittance controller is used to implement the exoskeleton's active follow-up control, which means that the person's motion is motivated by his/her intention and the exoskeleton control tries best to improve the human-robot wearable comfortable performance. To improve the wearable comfortable effect, serval regular gait tasks with different admittance parameters and step frequencies are statistically performed to obtain the optimal admittance control parameters. Finally, the BPNN compensation algorithm and two controllers are verified by the experimental exoskeleton prototype with human-robot cooperative motion.
[1] M Khamar, M Edrisi. Designing a backstepping sliding mode controller for an assistant human knee exoskeleton based on nonlinear disturbance observer. Mechatronics, 2018, 54: 121-132.
[2] G Aguirre-Ollinger, J E Colgate, M A Peshkin, et al. Design of an active one-degree-of-freedom lower-limb exoskeleton with inertia compensation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(4): 486-499.
[3] Y Yang, L Ma, D Huang. Development and repetitive learning control of lower limb exoskeleton driven by electrohydraulic actuators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(5): 4169-4178.
[4] X Li, Y H Liu, H Yu. Iterative learning impedance control for rehabilitation robots driven by series elastic actuators. Automatica, 2018, 90: 1-7.
[5] D Shi, W X Zhang, W Zhang, et al. A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 1-11.
[6] R Lu, Z Li, C Y Su, et al. Development and learning control of a human limb with a rehabilitation exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, 61(7): 3776-3785.
[7] Q Guo, Y Zhang, D Jiang. A control approach for human-mechatronic-hydraulic-coupled exoskeleton in overload-carrying condition. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2016, 31(4): 272-280.
[8] Q Guo, D Jiang. Method for walking gait identification in a lower extremity exoskeleton based on C4.5 decision tree algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2015, 12.
[9] Z Li, C Y Su, G Li, et al. Fuzzy approximation-based adaptive backstepping control of an exoskeleton for human upper limbs. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 23(3): 555-566.
[10] M K Dong, H Cheng, H T Tran, et al. Minimizing human-exoskeleton interaction force using compensation for dynamic uncertainty error with adaptive RBF network. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2016, 82(3-4): 413-433.
[11] W He, Z Li, Y Dong, et al. Design and adaptive control for an upper limb robotic exoskeleton in presence of input saturation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019, 30(1): 97-108.
[12] W Meng, Q Liu, Z Zhou, et al. Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. Mechatronics, 2015, 31: 132-145.
[13] N Hogan. Impedance control - an approach to manipulation. i - theory. ii - implementation. iii - applications. ASME Transactions Journal of Dynamic Systems & Measurement Control B, 1985, 107: 1-24.
[14] A Q L Keemink, H van der Kooij, A H Stienen. Admittance control for physical human-robot interaction. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2018, 37(11): 1421-1444.
[15] A N Sharkawy, P N Koustournpardis, N Aspragathos. Variable admittance control for human-robot collaboration based on online neural network training. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018: 1334-1339.
[16] J Buchli, F Stulp, E Theodorou, et al. Learning variable impedance control. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(7): 820-833.
[17] C Yang, G Peng, Y Li, et al. Neural networks enhanced adaptive admittance control of optimized robot-environment interaction. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019, 49(7): 2568-2579.
[18] F Ferraguti, C T Landi, L Sabattini, et al. A variable admittance control strategy for stable physical human-robot interaction. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2019, 38(6): 747-765.
[19] C T Landi, F Ferraguti, C Fantuzzi, et al. A passivity-based strategy for coaching in human-robot interaction. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2018: 1-6.
[20] C T Landi, F Ferraguti, C Fantuzzi, et al. Admittance control parameter adaptation for physical human-robot interaction. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017: 2911-2916.
[21] F Dimeas, N Aspragathos. Online stability in human-robot cooperation with admittance control. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2016, 9(2): 267-278.
[22] D Ryu, J B Song, S Kang, et al. Frequency domain stability observer and active damping control for stable haptic interaction. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2008, 2(4): 261-268.
[23] K Kronander, A Billard. Stability considerations for variable impedance control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2016, 32(5): 1298-1305.
[24] M J Kim, W Lee, J Y Choi, et al. A passivity-based nonlinear admittance control with application to powered upper-limb control under unknown environmental interactions. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(4): 1473-1484.
[25] K Gui, H Liu, D Zhang, et al. A practical and adaptive method to achieve EMG-based torque estimation for a robotic exoskeleton. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(2): 483-494.
[26] Y Zhuang, S Yao, C Ma, et al. Admittance control based on EMG-driven musculoskeletal model improves the human-robot synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 15(2): 1211-1218.
[27] X Yu, W He, Y Li, et al. Bayesian estimation of human impedance and motion intention for human-robot collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2019.2940-276.
[28] P B G Dohmann, S Hirche. Distributed control for cooperative manipulation with event-triggered communication. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2020, 36(4): 1038-1052.
[29] K Ba, G Ma, B Yu, et al. A nonlinear model-based variable impedance parameters control for position-based impedance control system of hydraulic drive unit. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2020, 18(7): 1806-1817.
[30] S S Ge, T H Lee, C J Harris. Adaptive neural network control of robotic manipulators. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1998.
