Special Issue on Processing of Biological Tissue

Ultrasonically Assisted Cutting of Histological Sections for Reducing the Environmental and Financial Impact of Microtomy

  • Dong Wang ,
  • Daniel De Becker ,
  • Anish Roy
Expand
  • 1. Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK;
    2. Department of Engineering, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK

Received date: 2021-09-11

  Revised date: 2022-03-14

  Online published: 2022-10-24

Abstract

Modern-day microtomy requires high precision equipment to thinly section biological tissues. The sectioned tissue must be of good quality not showing cutting tracks or so-called artefacts. The quality of these sections is dependent on the blade wear, which is related to the hardness of the tissue sample, cutting angle and cutting speed. A test rig has been designed and manufactured to allow these parameters to be controlled. This has allowed for the blade wear to be analysed and quantified, and this has been completed for both ultrasonically assisted and conventional cutting. The obtained results showed a 25.2% decrease in average blade roughness after 38 cuts when using the ultrasonically assisted cutting regime. The data also showed no adverse effect on the quality of the slides produced when using this cutting methodology. Finally, the cutting force measured for both cutting regimes showed that ultrasonically assisted cutting required less force compared to conventional cutting. With the reduction of surface roughness and force, it is possible to state that ultrasonically assisted cutting reduces the wear of the blade, thereby increasing the life of the blades. An increase of just 10% in blade life would yield a cost saving of approximately 25% thereby reducing the environmental and financial impact of microtomy.

Cite this article

Dong Wang , Daniel De Becker , Anish Roy . Ultrasonically Assisted Cutting of Histological Sections for Reducing the Environmental and Financial Impact of Microtomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022 , 35(3) : 42 -42 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-022-00722-3

References

[1] D Wang, PY Onawumi, SO Ismail, et al. Machinability of natural-fibre-reinforced polymer composites: Conventional vs ultrasonically-assisted machining. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2000, 119: 188–195.
[2] F Makhdum, VA Phadnis, A Roy, et al. Effect of ultrasonically-assisted drilling on carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(23): 5939–5952.
[3] H Jamshidi, MJ Nategh. Theoretical and experimental investigation of the frictional behavior of the tool-chip interface in ultrasonicvibration assisted turning. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 2013, 65: 1–7.
[4] AS Adnan, S Subbiah. Experimental investigation of transverse vibration-assisted orthogonal cutting of AL-2024. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 2010, 50: 294–302.
[5] H Ding, R Ibrahim, K Cheng, et al. Experimental study on machinability improvement of hardened tool steel using two dimensional vibration-assisted micro-end-milling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 2010, 50: 1115–1118.
[6] J Liu, D Zhang, L Qin, et al. Feasibility study of the rotary ultrasonic elliptical machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP). International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 2012, 53: 141–150.
[7] A Atkins, JF Vincent. An instrumented microtome for improved histological sections and the measurement of fracture toughness. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1984, 3: 310–312.
[8] GA Reilly, BAO McCormack, D Taylor. Cutting sharpness measurement: a critical review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 153–154(1): 261–267.
[9] VK Astashev and VI Babitsky. Ultrasonic processes and machines: dynamics, control and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.
[10] C Nath, M Rahman. Effect of machining parameters in ultrasonic vibration cutting. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 2008, 48(9): 965–974.
[11] M Zhou, BKA Ngoi, MN Yusoff, et al. Tool wear and surface finish in diamond cutting of optical glass. Journal of Materials Processing, 2006, 174(1–3): 29–33.
[12] W M Zeng, Z C Li, Z J Pei, et al. Experimental observation of tool wear in rotary ultrasonic machining of advanced ceramics. International Journal of Machine tools and Manufacturing, 2005, 45(12–13): 1468–1473.
[13] WT Dempster. The mechanics of paraffin sectioning by the microtome. The Anatomical Record, 1942, 84(3): 241–267.
[14] D Wang, A Roy, VV Silberschmidt. Ultrasonically assisted cutting of bio-tissues in microtomy. Physics Procedia, 2016, 87: 118–124.
[15] A Willis, JFV Vincent. Monitoring cutting forces with an instrumented histological microtome. Journal of Microscopy, 1995, 178(1): 56–65.
[16] A Sari, A Karaipekli. Thermal conductivity and latent heat thermal energy storage characteristics of paraffin/expanded graphite composite as phase change material. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(8–9): 1271–1277.
[17] K W Farag, J G Lyng, D J Morgan, et al. Effect of low temperatures (18 to+ 5 C) on the texture of beef lean. Meat science, 2009, 81(1): 249–254.
[18] D Wang, A Roy, VV Silberschmidt. Production of high-quality extremely-thin histological sections by ultrasonically assisted cutting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2020, 276: 116403.
[19] MJ Madou. Fundamentals of microfabrication and nanotechnology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012.
[20] S Wollington. Disposable microtome blades: a legacy forged in orient. Kent: Pathology in practice, 2010.
[21] Leica Biosystems. (206, 04 21). Microtome blades. Retrieved from leica Biosystems store: http://www.leicabiosystems.com/histology-consumables/microtome-blades/premium-surgipath-db80-series/details/product/surgipath-db80-hs/
Outlines

/