Large quadruped mammals, such as ruminants, have outstanding motion ability, including running and bounding. These advanced motion abilities are related to the buffer effect of their complicated musculoskeletal systems. However, the buffer effect of most bio-robots is not satisfactory owing to the simple design of their buffer systems. In this paper, a physiological analysis of the ruminant musculoskeletal system is presented to explain the intrinsic buffer mechanism of motion. Based on the physical buffer parts of the ruminant limbs, the corresponding bionic mappings were determined. These mappings were used to guide the mechanism design of the robot multistage buffer system. The multistage buffer system includes two main buffer mechanisms: the first stage and the second stage. The buffer mechanism analysis of the first stage and multiple stages is discussed in theory to compare the effects between the normal single buffer system and the novel multistage buffer system. Then, the detailed mechanical structure of the limbs was designed based on the limb mechanism design. To further verify the superior efficacy of the multistage buffer system, the corresponding walking simulation experiments were conducted after the virtual prototype of a quadruped robot with a novel limb was built completely. Both theoretical analysis and simulation experiments prove that the bionic robot design with the novel multistage buffer system achieves better motion performance than the traditional robot buffer design and can be regarded as the design template of the robot limb.
Yi Zheng
,
Kun Xu
,
Yaobin Tian
,
Huichao Deng
,
Xilun Ding
. Bionic Design and Analysis of a Novel Quadruped Robot with a Multistage Buffer System[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022
, 35(2)
: 32
-32
.
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-022-00700-9
[1] R McN Alexander. Three uses for springs in legged locomotion. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, 9(2): 53–61.
[2] S Tripathy, S Gaur. Rough terrain quadruped robot-BigDog. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021.
[3] R X Liu. Structural design and simulation optimization of quadruped robot. Beijing: North China University of Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
[4] J H Han. Control strategy based on flying trot gait for running quadruped robot. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
[5] J Y Liu. From big dog to spot mini: Evolution of boston powered quadruped robot. Robot Industry, 2018, 2: 109–116. (in Chinese)
[6] Y N Zhang, M Q An. Structure and software architecture design of an extremely low-cost quadruped robot for education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1931(1): 012007.
[7] L H Ding. Key Technology analysis of BigDog quadruped robot. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(7): 1–23. (in Chinese)
[8] C Gehring, S Coros, M Hutter, et al. Practice makes perfect: An optimization-based approach to controlling agile motions for a quadruped robot. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2016, 23(1): 34–43.
[9] M Wermelinger, P Fankhauser, R Diethelm, et al. Navigation planning for legged robots in challenging terrain. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, 2016: 1184–1189.
[10] X R Meng, S Wang, Z Q Cao, et al. A review of quadruped robots and environment perception. 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chengdu, 2016: 6350–6356.
[11] T Chen, X B Sun, Z Xu, et al. A trot and flying trot control method for quadruped robot based on optimal foot force distribution. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 621–632.
[12] L Wagner, P Fankhauser, M Bloesch, et al. Foot contact estimation for legged robots in rough terrain. Advances in Cooperative Robotics, 2017: 395–403.
[13] D J Hyun, J Lee, S I Park, et al. Implementation of trot-to-gallop transition and subsequent gallop on the MIT Cheetah I. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016, 35(13): 1627–1650.
[14] G Bledt, P M Wensing, S Kim. Policy-regularized model predictive control to stabilize diverse quadrupedal gaits for the mit cheetah. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, 2017: 4102–4109.
[15] S W Heim, M Ajallooeian, P Eckert, et al. On designing an active tail for legged robots: Simplifying control via decoupling of control objectives. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2016.
[16] G S Kumar, S Aravind, R Subramanian, et al. Literature Survey on Four-Legged Robots. Trends in Mechanical and Biomedical Design, 2021: 691–702.
[17] P Eckert. Towards agility: Definition, benchmark and design considerations for small, quadrupedal robots. Lausanne: EPFL, 2018.
[18] M Zieliński, D Belter. Mechanical design and control of compliant leg for a quadruped robot. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2018, 743: 500–509.
[19] P Eckert, A E M Schmerbauch, T Horvat, et al. Towards rich motion skills with the lightweight quadruped robot serval–a design, control and experimental study. International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Frankfurt, 2018: 41–55.
[20] D H Chadwick. A beast the color of winter: The mountain goat observed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002.
[21] B L Smith. Life on the rocks: A portrait of the mountain goat. Washington DC: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
[22] M Doube, A A Felder, M Y Chua, et al. Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls. Royal Society open science, 2018, 5(10): 180152.
[23] Q Zhang. Study on anti-slip and buffer characteristics of goat foot and design of bionic foot. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[24] H E Koenig, R Korbel, H G Liebich, et al. Avian anatomy: Textbook and colour atlas. Sheffield: 5m Books Ltd, 2016.
[25] Q Zhang, K Xu, X L Ding. Investigation of feet functions of large ruminants with a decoupled model of equivalent mechanism. Biology Open, 2017, 6(4): 407–414.
[26] Q Zhang, X L Ding, K Xu. Terrain adaptability mechanism of large ruminants' feet on the kinematics view. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2015, 2015: 1–9.
[27] R R Ashdown, S H Done, S W Barnett. Color atlas of veterinary anatomy, volume 1, the ruminants e-book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2010.
[28] K Xu, X L Ding. Typical gait analysis of a six-legged robot in the context of metamorphic mechanism theory. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 26(4): 771–783.
[29] X L Ding, Y Zheng, K Xu. Wheel-legged hexapod robots: A multifunctional mobile manipulating platform. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30(1): 3–6.
[30] Y Sakakibara, K Kan, Y Hosoda, et al. Foot trajectory for a quadruped walking machine. IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications, Ibaraki, 1990: 315–322.
[31] K M Lynch, F C Park. Modern robotics: Mechanics, planning, and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
[32] G A Cavagna, N C Heglund, C R Taylor. Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for mini-mizing energy expenditure. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 1977, 233(5): R243-R261.
[33] R Blickhan. The spring-mass model for running and hopping. Journal of Biomechanics, 1989, 22(11-12): 1217-1227.
