Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering >

2021 , Vol. 34 >Issue 6: 118 - 118

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-021-00631-x

Review

Effect of Machined Surface Integrity on Fatigue Performance of Metal Workpiece: A Review

  • Guoliang Liu ,
  • Chuanzhen Huang ,
  • Bin Zhao ,
  • Wei Wang ,
  • Shufeng Sun
Expand
  • 1 School of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, 266033, China;
    2 Center for Advanced Jet Engineering Technologies (CaJET), Key Laboratory of High-efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture (Ministry of Education), National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Mechanical Engineering (Shandong University), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, China;
    3 Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Wöhlerstraße 11, 79108, Freiburg, Germany;
    4 College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, China

Received date: 2020-05-13

  Revised date: 2021-03-05

  Online published: 2022-04-03

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52005281), Major Program of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. ZR2018ZA0401), and Applied Basic Research Projects for Qingdao Innovation Plan (Grant No. 18-2-2-67-jch).

Fold

Abstract

Fatigue performance is a serious concern for mechanical components subject to cyclical stresses, particularly where safety is paramount. The fatigue performance of components relies closely on their surface integrity because the fatigue cracks generally initiate from free surfaces. This paper reviewed the published data, which addressed the effects of machined surface integrity on the fatigue performance of metal workpieces. Limitations in existing studies and the future directions in anti-fatigue manufacturing field were proposed. The remarkable surface topography (e.g., low roughness and few local defects and inclusions) and large compressive residual stress are beneficial to fatigue performance. However, the indicators that describe the effects of surface topography and residual stress accurately need further study and exploration. The effect of residual stress relaxation under cycle loadings needs to be precisely modeled precisely. The effect of work hardening on fatigue performance had two aspects. Work hardening could increase the material yield strength, thereby delaying crack nucleation. However, increased brittleness could accelerate crack propagation. Thus, finding the effective control mechanism and method of work hardening is urgently needed to enhance the fatigue performance of machined components. The machining-induced metallurgical structure changes, such as white layer, grain refinement, dislocation, and martensitic transformation affect the fatigue performance of a workpiece significantly. However, the unified and exact conclusion needs to be investigated deeply. Finally, different surface integrity factors had complicated reciprocal effects on fatigue performance. As such, studying the comprehensive influence of surface integrity further and establishing the reliable prediction model of workpiece fatigue performance are meaningful for improving reliability of components and reducing test cost.

Key words： Surface integrity; Machining; Fatigue performance; Reciprocal effects

Cite this article

Guoliang Liu , Chuanzhen Huang , Bin Zhao , Wei Wang , Shufeng Sun . Effect of Machined Surface Integrity on Fatigue Performance of Metal Workpiece: A Review[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021 , 34(6) : 118 -118 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00631-x

References

[1] B A Cowles. High cycle fatigue in aircraft gas turbines-an industry perspective. International Journal of Fracture, 1996, 80(2):147-163.
[2] S Hasunuma, S Oki, K Motomatsu, et al. Fatigue life prediction of carbon steel with machined surface layer under low-cycle fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 123:255-267.
[3] Y S Niu, P Zhao, X Li, et al. Influence of finish milling parameters on machined surface integrity and fatigue behavior of Ti1023 workpiece. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 91(1):1297-1307.
[4] D Novovic, R C Dewes, D K Aspinwall, et al. The effect of machined topography and integrity on fatigue life. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2004, 44(2-3):125-134.
[5] G L Liu, C Z Huang, R Su, et al. 3D FEM simulation of the turning process of stainless steel 17-4PH with differently texturized cutting tools. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 155:417-429.
[6] S Smith, S N Melkote, E Lara-Curzio, et al. Effect of surface integrity of hard turned AISI 52100 steel on fatigue performance. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2007, 459(1-2):337-346.
[7] F Hashimoto, Y B Guo, A W Warren. Surface integrity difference between hard turned and ground surfaces and its impact on fatigue life. CIRP Annals, 2006, 55(1):81-84.
[8] Y B Guo, A W Warren. The impact of surface integrity by hard turning vs. grinding on fatigue damage mechanisms in rolling contact. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2008, 203(3):291-299.
[9] Y B Guo, D W Yen. Hard turning versus grinding-The effect of process-induced residual stress on rolling contact. Wear, 2004, 256(3):393-399.
[10] A M Abrāo, D K Aspinwall. The surface integrity of turned and ground hardened bearing steel. Wear, 1996, 196:279-284.
[11] A R Sharman, D K Aspinwall, R C Dewes, et al. The effects of machined workpiece surface integrity on the fatigue life of γ-titanium aluminide. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2001, 41(11):1681-1685.
[12] S A Bentley, A L Mantle, D K Aspinwall. The effect of machining on the fatigue strength of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic alloy. Intermetallics, 1999, 7(8):967-969.
[13] L Xun, C M Guan, P Zhao. Influences of milling and grinding on machined surface roughness and fatigue behavior of GH4169 superalloy workpieces. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 31(6):1399-1405.
[14] D Taylor, O M Clancy. The fatigue performance of machined surfaces. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2010, 14(2-3):329-336.
[15] D Novovic, D K Aspinwall, R C Dewes, et al. The effect of surface and subsurface condition on the fatigue life of ti-25v-15cr-2al-0.2c%wt alloy. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 65(1):523-528.
[16] F Ghanem, H Sidhom, C Braham, et al. Effect of near-surface residual stress and microstructure modification from machining on the fatigue endurance of a tool steel. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2002, 11(6):631-639.
[17] T M Mower. Degradation of titanium 6Al-4V fatigue strength due to electrical discharge machining. International Journal of Fatigue, 2014, 64:84-96.
[18] M Lundberg, J Saarimaki, J Moverare, et al. Surface integrity and fatigue behaviour of electric discharged machined and milled austenitic stainless steel. Materials Characterization, 2017, 124:215-222.
[19] L Wagner. Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 1999, 263(2):210-216.
[20] Z K Xu, J Dunleavey, M Antar, et al. The influence of shot peening on the fatigue response of Ti-6Al-4V surfaces subject to different machining processes. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 111:196-207.
[21] D Yang, Z Q Liu, X Xiao, et al. The effects of machining-induced surface topography on fatigue performance of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 71:27-30.
[22] X Y Wang, C Z Huang, B Zou, et al. Experimental study of surface integrity and fatigue life in the face milling of Inconel 718. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2):243-250.
[23] W MHuang, J Zhao, J T Niu, et al. Comparison in surface integrity and fatigue performance for hardened steel ball-end milled with different milling speeds. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 71:267-271.
[24] Y Choi. Effects of cutting speed on surface integrity and fatigue performance of hard machined surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2019, 20(1):139-146.
[25] Y Choi. Influence of feed rate on surface integrity and fatigue performance of machined surfaces. International Journal of Fatigue, 2015, 78:46-52.
[26] A Javidi, U Rieger, W Eichlseder. The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(10):2050-2055.
[27] A Pramanik, M N Islam, I J Davies, et al. Contribution of machining to the fatigue behaviour of metal matrix composites (MMCs) of varying reinforcement size. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 102:9-17.
[28] Y Choi. Influence of rake angle on surface integrity and fatigue performance of machined surfaces. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 94:81-88.
[29] H K Akyildiz, H Livatyali. Effects of machining parameters on fatigue behavior of machined threaded test specimens. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(2):1015-1022.
[30] J Holmberg, J C Berglund, A Wretland, et al. Evaluation of surface integrity after high energy machining with EDM, laser beam machining and abrasive water jet machining of alloy 718. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 100(5):1575-1591.
[31] A Warhadpande, F Sadeghi. Effects of surface defects on rolling contact fatigue of heavily loaded lubricated contacts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J:Journal of Engineering Tribology, 2010, 224(10):1061-1077.
[32] S Güngö, L Edwards. Effect of surface texture on the initiation and propagation of small fatigue cracks in a forged 6082 aluminium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 1993, 160(1):17-24.
[33] M Taraf, E H Zahaf, O Oussouaddi, et al. Numerical analysis for predicting the rolling contact fatigue crack initiation in a railway wheel steel. Tribology International, 2010, 43(3):585-593.
[34] A Fatemi, R Molaei, S Sharifimehr, et al. Torsional fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V by powder bed fusion including surface finish effect. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 99:187-201.
[35] H Sasahara. The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0.45% C steel. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2005, 45(2):131-136.
[36] A Klumpp, S Maier, H Chen, et al. Influence of work-hardening on fatigue crack growth, effective threshold and crack opening behavior in the nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 116:257-267.
[37] H Sidhom, N Ben Moussa, B Ben Fathallah, et al. Effect of surface properties on the fatigue life of manufactured parts:Experimental analysis and multi-axial criteria. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 996:715-721.
[38] L Trsko, O Bokuvka, F Novy, et al. Effect of severe shot peening on ultra-high-cycle fatigue of a low-alloy steel. Materials & Design, 2014, 57:103-113.
[39] M Fernandes, M Torres, M Fonseca, et al. Investigation of residual stress, stress relaxation and work hardening effects induced by shot peening on the fatigue life of AA 6005-T6 aluminum alloy. Materials Research Express, 2020, 6:1265i2.
[40] M Nakajima, Y Uematsu, T Kakiuchi, et al. Effect of quantity of martensitic transformation on fatigue behavior in type 304 stainless steel. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 10(7):299-304.
[41] E R D L Rio, A Navarro. Grain orientation and work hardening considerations on short fatigue crack modelling. Philosophical Magazine A, 1990, 61(3):435-449.
[42] J Walker, D J Thomas, Y Gao. Effects of shot peening and pre-strain on the fatigue life of dual phase martensitic and bainitic steels. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2017, 26:419-424.
[43] S Saberifar, A Mashreghi, M Mosalaeepur, et al. The interaction between non-metallic inclusions and surface roughness in fatigue failure and their influence on fatigue strength. Materials & Design, 2012, 35:720-724.
[44] B Vayssette, N Saintier, C Brugger, et al. Numerical modelling of surface roughness effect on the fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V obtained by additive manufacturing. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 123:180-195.
[45] N T Aboulkhair, I Maskery, C Tuck, et al. Improving the fatigue behaviour of a selectively laser melted aluminium alloy:Influence of heat treatment and surface quality. Materials & Design, 2016, 104:174-182.
[46] A Fatemi, R Molaei, S Sharifimehr, et al. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 100:347-366.
[47] C Prakash, H K Kansal, B S Pabla, et al. Powder mixed electric discharge machining:an innovative surface modification technique to enhance fatigue performance and bioactivity of β-Ti implant for orthopedics application. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2016, 16(4):041006.
[48] S Bagehorn, J Wehr, H J Maier. Application of mechanical surface finishing processes for roughness reduction and fatigue improvement of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V parts. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 102:135-142.
[49] L Wagner, J K Gregory. Thermomechanical surface treatment of titanium alloys. Materials Science Forum, 1994, 163:159-172.
[50] J Gunther, S Leuders, P Koppa, et al. On the effect of internal channels and surface roughness on the high-cycle fatigue performance of Ti-6Al-4V processed by SLM. Materials & Design, 2018, 143:1-11.
[51] J W Pegues, M D Roach, R S Williamson, et al. Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 116:543-552.
[52] A Suarez, F Veiga, L N De Lacalle, et al. Effects of ultrasonics-assisted face milling on surface integrity and fatigue life of Ni-Alloy 718. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2016, 25(11):5076-5086.
[53] C Shao, H Cui, F Lu, et al. Quantitative relationship between weld defect characteristic and fatigue crack initiation life for high-cycle fatigue property. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 123:238-247.
[54] W Koster. Effect of residual stress on fatigue of structural alloys. Practical Applications of Residual Stress Technology, Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1991:1-9.
[55] A Pramanik, A K Basak. Fracture and fatigue life of Al-based MMCs machined at different conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 191:33-45.
[56] S Beretta, S Romano. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 94:178-191.
[57] D Arola, C L Williams. Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces. International Journal of Fatigue, 2002, 24(9):923-930.
[58] A S Guilherme, G E Henriques, R A Zavanelli, et al. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2005, 93(4):378-385.
[59] N A Alang, N A Razak, A K Miskam. Effect of surface roughness on fatigue life of notched carbon steel. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2011, 11(1):160-163.
[60] M Suraratchai, J Limido, C Mabru, et al. Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(12):2119-2126.
[61] M R Bayoumi, A K Abdellatif. Effect of surface finish on fatigue strength. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1995, 51(5):861-870.
[62] F Abroug, E Pessard, G Germain, et al. A probabilistic approach to study the effect of machined surface states on HCF behavior of a AA7050 alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 116:473-489.
[63] B Griffiths. Manufacturing surface technology:Surface integrity and functional performance. Elsevier, 2001
[64] E Siebel. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of steels and non-ferrous alloys. Engineers Digest, 1957, 18:109-112.
[65] G R Leverant, B S Langer, A Yuen, et al. Surface residual stresses, surface topography and the fatigue behavior of Ti-6AI-4V. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A-physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1979, 10(2):251-257.
[66] F Abroug, E Pessard, G Germain, et al. HCF of AA7050 alloy containing surface defects:Study of the statistical size effect. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 110:81-94.
[67] A R Balachandramurthi, J Moverare, N Dixit, et al. Influence of defects and as-built surface roughness on fatigue properties of additively manufactured Alloy 718. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2018, 735:463-474.
[68] A L Mantle, D K Aspinwall. Surface integrity and fatigue life of turned gamma titanium aluminide. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1997, 72(3):413-420.
[69] J C Newman, E P Phillips, M H Swain. Fatigue-life prediction methodology using small-crack theory. International Journal of Fatigue, 1999, 21:109-119.
[70] H L Deng, Q C Liu, H Liu, et al. Long-life fatigue of carburized 12cr2ni alloy steel:Evaluation of failure characteristic and prediction of fatigue strength. Metals, 2018, 8(12):1006.
[71] B Skallerud, S K Ås, N S Ottosen. A gradient-based multiaxial criterion for fatigue crack initiation prediction in components with surface roughness. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 117:384-395.
[72] H Neuber. Theory of stress concentration for shear-strained prismatical bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress-strain law. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1961, 28(4):544-550.
[73] D Arola, M Ramulu. An examination of the effects from surface texture on the strength of fiber reinforced plastics. Journal of Composite Materials, 1999, 33(2):102-123.
[74] S K As, B Skallerud, B W Tveiten, et al. Fatigue life prediction of machined components using finite element analysis of surface topography. International Journal of Fatigue, 2005, 27(10):1590-1596.
[75] Y B Gao, X B Li, Q X Yang, et al. Influence of surface integrity on fatigue strength of 40CrNi2Si2MoVA steel. Materials Letters, 2007, 61(2):466-469.
[76] G L Liu, C Z Huang, B Zou, et al. Surface integrity and fatigue performance of 17-4PH stainless steel after cutting operations. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2016, 307:182-189.
[77] J Seo, B C Goo, J Choi, et al. Effects of metal removal and residual stress on the contact fatigue life of railway wheels. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(10):2021-2029.
[78] Z Chen, J Moverare, R L Peng, et al. Surface integrity and fatigue performance of inconel 718 in wire electrical discharge machining. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 45:307-310.
[79] M Gerstenmeyer, F Zanger, V Schulze. Influence of complementary machining on fatigue strength of AISI 4140. CIRP Annals, 2018, 67(1):583-586.
[80] F Ghanem, N B Fredj, H Sidhom, et al. Effects of finishing processes on the fatigue life improvements of electro-machined surfaces of tool steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 52(5):583-595.
[81] B R Sridhar, K Ramachandra, K A Padmanabhan. Effect of shot peening on the fatigue and fracture behaviour of two titanium alloys. Journal of Materials Science, 1996, 31(22):5953-5960.
[82] T Klotz, D Delbergue, P Bocher, et al. Surface characteristics and fatigue behavior of shot peened Inconel 718. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 110:10-21.
[83] R Aviles, J Albizuri, A Rodriguez, et al. Influence of low-plasticity ball burnishing on the high-cycle fatigue strength of medium carbon AISI 1045 steel. International Journal of Fatigue, 2013, 55:230-244.
[84] C Yao, L Ma, Y Du et al. Surface integrity and fatigue behavior in shot-peening for high-speed milled 7055 aluminum alloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2017, 231(2):243-256.
[85] B Gerin, E Pessard, F Morel, et al. Influence of surface integrity on the fatigue behaviour of a hot-forged and shot-peened C70 steel component. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2017, 686:121-133.
[86] G L Liu, C Z Huang, B Zou, et al. Feasibility study of taking high-speed dry milling as the final manufacturing process by the standard of service performance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 95(5):2897-2906.
[87] S O A El-Helieby, G W Rowe. Influences of surface roughness and residual stress on fatigue life of ground steel components. Metals Technology, 1980, 7(1):221-225.
[88] Y Liu, J Liu and X Shao. Study on the residual stress fields, surface quality, and fatigue performance of cold expansion hole. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2011, 26(2):294-303.
[89] C J Lammi, D A Lados. Effects of residual stresses on fatigue crack growth behavior of structural materials:Analytical corrections. International Journal of Fatigue, 2011, 33(7):858-867.
[90] Y Ochi, K Masaki, T Matsumura, et al. Effect of shot-peening treatment on high cycle fatigue property of ductile cast iron. International Journal of Fatigue, 2001, 23(5):441-448.
[91] C Yao, D Wu, L Ma, et al. Surface integrity evolution and fatigue evaluation after milling mode, shot-peening and polishing mode for TB6 titanium alloy. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 387:1257-1264.
[92] M Liu, J Takagi, A Tsukuda. Effect of tool nose radius and tool wear on residual stress distribution in hard turning of bearing steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 150(3):234-241.
[93] G L Liu, C Z Huang, B Zou, et al. The modification of corrosion resistance of 17-4PH stainless steel by cutting process. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 49:447-455.
[94] Y Hua, Z Q Liu, B Wang, et al. Surface modification through combination of finish turning with low plasticity burnishing and its effect on fatigue performance for Inconel 718. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2019, 375:508-517.
[95] D W Schwach, Y B Guo. A fundamental study on the impact of surface integrity by hard turning on rolling contact fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 2006, 28(12):1838-1844.
[96] A Drechsler, T Dorr, L Wagner. Mechanical surface treatments on Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al for improved fatigue resistance. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 1998, 243(1):217-220.
[97] A M Hassan, A Momani. Further improvements in some properties of shot peened components using the burnishing process. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2000, 40(12):1775-1786.
[98] M Benedetti, V Fontanari, P Scardi, et al. Reverse bending fatigue of shot peened 7075-T651 aluminium alloy:The role of residual stress relaxation. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009, 31(8):1225-1236.
[99] N Hempel, J R Bunn, T Nitschkepagel, et al. Study on the residual stress relaxation in girth-welded steel pipes under bending load using diffraction methods. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2017, 688:289-300.
[100] G L Liu, C Z Huang, H T Zhu, et al. The modified surface properties and fatigue life of Incoloy A286 face-milled at different cutting parameters. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2017, 704(704):1-9.
[101] D Yang, Z Q Liu. Surface integrity generated with peripheral milling and the effect on low-cycle fatigue performance of aeronautic titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. The Aeronautical Journal, 2018, 122(1248):316-332.
[102] A T Özdemir, L Edwards. Relaxation of residual stresses at cold-worked fastener holes due to fatigue loading. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 1997, 20(10):1443-1451.
[103] K Dalaei, B Karlsson, L E Svensson. Stability of shot peening induced residual stresses and their influence on fatigue lifetime. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2011, 528(3):1008-1015.
[104] W Z Zhuang, G R Halford. Investigation of residual stress relaxation under cyclic load. International Journal of Fatigue, 2001, 23:31-37.
[105] M A Torres, H J Voorwald. An evaluation of shot peening, residual stress and stress relaxation on the fatigue life of AISI 4340 steel. International Journal of Fatigue, 2002, 24(8):877-886.
[106] S S Creţu, N G Popinceanu. The influence of residual stresses induced by plastic deformation on rolling contact fatigue. Wear, 1985, 105(2):153-170.
[107] L Yan, W Yang, H Jin, et al. Analytical modelling of microstructure changes in the machining of 304 stainless steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 58(1):45-55.
[108] X P Ren, Z Q Liu. Influence of cutting parameters on work hardening behavior of surface layer during turning superalloy Inconel 718. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 86(5-8):2319-2327.
[109] C P Jones, W R Tyfour, J H Beynon, et al. The effect of strain hardening on shakedown limits of a pearlitic rail steel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail & Rapid Transit, 1997, 211(2):131-140.
[110] Y Murakami. Metal fatigue:effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions. Academic Press, 2019.
[111] S I Nishida, C Zhou, N Hattori, et al. Fatigue strength improvement of notched structural steels with work hardening. Materials Science & Engineering:A, 2007, 468:176-183.
[112] S M Lyalikov. Effect of surface plastic deformation on the inelastic characteristics and fatigue limit of steels 20 and 14kh17n2 with cyclic torsion. Strength of Materials, 1989, 21(5):687-690.
[113] T Fukui, K Matuda, T Fujita, et al. Influence of work hardening on the rolling contact fatigue strength of the stainless steel (sus 304, sus 405). Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan, 1985, 33(4):1033-1038.
[114] F P Inés, M Guagliano. About the role of residual stresses and surface work hardening on fatigue Δkth of a nitrided and shot peened low-alloy steel. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2008, 202(13):3072-3080.
[115] P T Iswanto, S I Nishida, N Hattori, et al. Effect of roller-working on fatigue strength improvement of notched structural stainless steel. Key Engineering Materials, 2006, 306-308(Pt1):151-156.
[116] A Lanzutti, M Pujatti, M Magnan, et al. Uniaxial fatigue properties of closed die hot forged 42CrMo4 steel:Effect of flash and mechanical surface treatments. Materials & Design, 2017, 132:324-336.
[117] X Zhao, G Xue, Y Liu. Gradient crystalline structure induced by ultrasonic impacting and rolling and its effect on fatigue behavior of tc11 titanium alloy. Results in Physics, 2017, 7:1845-1851.
[118] M Calcagnotto, D Ponge, D Raabe. Effect of grain refinement to 1 μm on strength and toughness of dual-phase steels. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2010, 527(29-30):7832-7840.
[119] H Somekawa, T Mukai. Effect of grain refinement on fracture toughness in extruded pure magnesium. Scripta Materialia, 2005, 53(9):1059-1064.
[120] A Cox, S Herbert, J P Villainchastre, et al. The effect of machining and induced surface deformation on the fatigue performance of a high strength metastable β titanium alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 124:26-33.
[121] Q Chen, X Leng, E Shao. Influence of microstructure and residual stress on the stages of case crushing. Wear, 1988, 122(1):45-55.
[122] J W Morris, Z Guo, C R Krenn, et al. The limits of strength and toughness in steel. ISIJ International, 2001, 41(6):599-611.
[123] Y Uematsu, T Kakiuchi, M Akita, et al. Effect of strain-induced martensitic transformation on high cycle fatigue behavior in cyclically-prestrained type 304. Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan, 2013, 62(12):744-749.
[124] K Genel, M Demirkol, M Capa. Effect of ion nitriding on fatigue behaviour of AISI 4140 steel. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2000, 279(1):207-216.
[125] Y B Guo, D W Schwach. An experimental investigation of white layer on rolling contact fatigue using acoustic emission technique. International Journal of Fatigue, 2005, 27(9):1051-1061.
[126] E A Shur, N Y Bychkova, S M Trushevsky. Physical metallurgy aspects of rolling contact fatigue of rail steels. Wear, 2005, 258(7):1165-1171.
[127] C F Yao, L Tan, J Ren, et al. Surface integrity and fatigue behavior for high-speed milling Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al titanium alloy. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 14(1):102-112.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

　 Copyright © Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd,.