Original Article

RSDM: A Powerful Direct Method to Predict the Asymptotic Cyclic Behavior of Elastoplastic Structures

  • Konstantinos V. Spiliopoulos ,
  • Ioannis A. Kapogiannis
Expand
  • Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research, Department of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 157-80, Athens, Greece

Received date: 2021-03-03

  Revised date: 2021-11-05

  Online published: 2022-04-03

Supported by

Not applicable.

Abstract

Mechanical engineering structures and structural components are often subjected to cyclic thermomechanical loading which stresses their material beyond its elastic limits well inside the inelastic regime. Depending on the level of loading inelastic strains may lead either to failure, due to low cycle fatigue or ratcheting, or to safety, through elastic shakedown. Thus, it is important to estimate the asymptotic stress state of such structures. This state may be determined by cumbersome incremental time-stepping calculations. Direct methods, alternatively, have big computational advantages as they focus on the characteristics of these states and try to establish them, in a direct way, right from the beginning of the calculations. Among the very few such general-purpose direct methods, a powerful direct method which has been called RSDM has appeared in the literature. The method may directly predict any asymptotic state when the exact time history of the loading is known. The advantage of the method is due to the fact that it addresses the physics of the asymptotic cycle and exploits the cyclic nature of its expected residual stress distribution. Based on RSDM a method for the shakedown analysis of structures, called RSDM-S has also been developed. Despite most direct methods for shakedown, RSDM-S does not need an optimization algorithm for its implementation. Both RSDM and RSDM-S may be implemented in any Finite Element Code. A thorough review of both these methods, together with examples of implementation are presented herein.

Cite this article

Konstantinos V. Spiliopoulos , Ioannis A. Kapogiannis . RSDM: A Powerful Direct Method to Predict the Asymptotic Cyclic Behavior of Elastoplastic Structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021 , 34(6) : 140 -140 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00658-0

References

[1] D C Drucker. A definition of stable inelastic material. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1959, 26:101-106.
[2] E Melan. Zur Plastizität des räumlichen Kontinuums, Ingenieur-Archiv, 1938, 9:116-126.
[3] W Koiter. General theorems for elastic-plastic solids. In: Progress in Solid Mechanics. I N Sneddon, R Hill, North-Holland, 1960.
[4] G Maier. Shakedown theory in perfect elastoplasticity with associated and nonassociated flow-laws:a finite element, linear programming approach. Meccanica, 1969, 4:1-11.
[5] A Spagnoli, G Beccarelli, M Terzano, et al. A numerical study on frictional shakedown in large-scale three-dimensional conforming elastic contacts. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2021, 217-218:1-14.
[6] J-H Ri, H-S Hong. A basis reduction method using proper orthogonal decomposition for shakedown analysis of kinematic hardening material. Computational Mechanics, 2019, 64:1-13.
[7] H V Do, H Nguyen-Xuan. Limit and shakedown isogeometric analysis of structures based on Bezier extraction. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2017, 63:149-164.
[8] J-W Simon, D Höwer, D Weichert. A starting-point strategy for interior-point algorithms for shakedown analysis of engineering structures. Engineering Optimization, 2014, 46(5):648-668.
[9] D Weichert, A Hachemi, J Simon. Progress in lower bound direct methods. ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2015, 137(3):031005.
[10] C V Le, T D Tran, D C Pham. Rotating plasticity and nonshakedown collapse modes for elastic-plastic bodies under cyclic loads. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, 111:55-64.
[11] F Qin, L Zhang, G Chen, et al. Lower bound limit and shakedown analysis of orthotropic materials. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 2019, 25:2037-2049.
[12] J Zhang, A Oueslati, W Q Shen, et al. Shakedown analysis of a hollow sphere by interior-point method with non-linear optimization. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020, 175:105515.
[13] N T Tran, M Staat. Direct plastic structural design under lognormally distributed strength by chance constrained programming. Optimization and Engineering, 2020, 21:131-157.
[14] K Li, G Cheng, Y Wang, et al. A novel primal-dual eigenstress-driven method for shakedown analysis of structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2021, 122:2770-2801.
[15] A R S Ponter, K F Carter. Limit state solutions, based upon linear solutions with a spatially varying elastic modulus. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 1997, 140:237-258.
[16] H F Chen, A R S Ponter. A method for the evaluation of a ratchet limit and the amplitude of plastic strain for bodies subjected to cyclic loading. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2001, 20:555-571.
[17] A R S Ponter, H F Chen. A direct method on the evaluation of ratchet limit. ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2010, 132(4):041202.
[18] J Bree. Elastic-plastic behaviour of thin tubes subjected to internal pressure and intermittent high-heat fluxes with application to fast-nuclear-reactor fuel elements. Journal of Strain Analysis, 1967, 2:226-238.
[19] R Adisi-Asl, W Reinhardt. Non-cyclic shakedown/ratcheting boundary determination-Part 1:Analytical approach. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2011, 88:311-320.
[20] J Abou-Hanna, T E McGreevy. A simplified ratcheting limit method based on limit analysis using modified yield surface. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2011, 88:11-18.
[21] D A Gokhfeld, O F Cherniavsky. Limit analysis of structures at thermal cycling. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980.
[22] M Lytwyn, H F Chen, A R S Ponter. A generalized method for ratchet analysis of structures undergoing arbitrary thermo-mechanical load histories. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2015, 104:104-124.
[23] R SantAnna, N Zouain. A direct method for ratchet boundary determination. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2019, 75:156-168.
[24] M H Maitournam, B Pommier, J-J Thomas. Determination of the asymptotic response of a structure under cyclic thermomechanical loading. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2002, 330(10):703-708.
[25] Abaqus 6.14. Theory & User's Manual. Dassault Systems, 2014.
[26] N Zouain, R SantAnna. Computational formulation for the asymptotic response of elastoplastic solids under cyclic loads. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2017, 61:267-278.
[27] K V Spiliopoulos, K D Panagiotou. A direct method to predict cyclic steady states of elastoplastic structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2012, 223-224:186-198.
[28] K V Spiliopoulos. A simplified method to predict the steady cyclic stress state of creeping structures. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2002, 69:148-153.
[29] K V Spiliopoulos, K D Panagiotou. A residual stress decomposition based method for the shakedown analysis of structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2014, 276:410-430.
[30] K V Spiliopoulos, K D Panagiotou. A numerical procedure for the shakedown analysis of structures under cyclic thermomechanical loading. Archives of Applied Mechanics, 2015, 85:1499-1511.
[31] K D Panagiotou, K V Spiliopoulos. Assessment of the cyclic behavior of structural components using novel approaches. ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2016, 138:041201.
[32] K V Spiliopoulos, K D Panagiotou. An enhanced numerical procedure for the shakedown analysis in multidimensional loading domains. Computers & Structures, 2017, 193:155-171.
[33] I A Kapogiannis, K V Spiliopoulos. Recent updates of the residual stress decomposition method for shakedown analysis. In:A A Pisano, K V Spiliopoulos, D Weichert. Direct Methods:Methodological progress and engineering applications. Springer Nature, 2021:117-136.
[34] C O Frederick, P J Armstrong. Convergent internal stresses and steady cyclic states of stress. Journal of Strain Analysis, 1966, 1:154-169.
[35] J C Simo, T J R Hughes. Computational inelasticity. Springer, 1988.
[36] R L Taylor. FEAP-Finite element analysis program. University of California, Berkeley, 2014.
[37] G Garcea, G Armentano, S Petrolo, et al. Finite element shakedown analysis of two-dimensional structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2005, 63:1174-1202.
[38] J A König. Shakedown of elastic-plastic structures. Elsevier, 1987.
[39] A R S Ponter, M Engelhardt. Shakedown limits for a general yield condition:implementation and application for a von Mises yield condition. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2000, 19:423-445.
[40] J W Simon, D Weichert. Shakedown analysis with multidimensional loading spaces. Computational Mechanics, 2012, 49:477-485.
[41] A Nijenhuis, H S Wilf. Combinatorial algorithms. Academic Press, 1978.
[42] P T Pham. Upper bound limit and shakedown analysis of elastic-plastic bounded linearly kinematic hardening structures. RWTH Aachen University, 2011.
Outlines

/