As the manufacturing industry is facing increasingly serious environmental problems, because of which carbon tax policies are being implemented, choosing the optimum cutting parameters during the machining process is crucial for automobile panel dies in order to achieve synergistic minimization of the environment impact, product quality, and processing efciency. This paper presents a processing task-based evaluation method to optimize the cutting parameters, considering the trade-of among carbon emissions, surface roughness, and processing time. Three objective models and their relationships with the cutting parameters were obtained through input–output, response surface, and theoretical analyses, respectively. Examples of cylindrical turning were applied to achieve a central composite design (CCD), and relative validation experiments were applied to evaluate the proposed method. The experiments were conducted on the CAK50135di lathe cutting of AISI 1045 steel, and NSGA-II was used to obtain the Pareto fronts of the three objectives. Based on the TOPSIS method, the Pareto solution set was ranked to fnd the optimal solution to evaluate and select the optimal cutting parameters. An S/N ratio analysis and contour plots were applied to analyze the infuence of each decision variable on the optimization objective. Finally, the changing rules of a single factor for each objective were analyzed. The results demonstrate that the proposed method is efective in fnding the trade-of among the three objectives and obtaining reasonable application ranges of the cutting parameters from Pareto fronts.
Zhipeng Jiang
,
Dong Gao
,
Yong Lu
,
Xianli Liu
. Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Trade-off Among Carbon Emissions, Surface Roughness, and Processing Time[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019
, 32(6)
: 94
-94
.
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-019-0408-9
[1] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. China Vehicle Environmental Management Annual Report (2018). http://www.vecc-mep.org.cn/huanbao/content/944.html. (in Chinese)
[2] X L Liu, Z P Jiang, M Y LI, et al. New rounded end mill for mold processing based on scallop-height. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(5): 192-204. (in Chinese)
[3] D F Liu, X J Zhang. The infuence of hard turning technology on product quality and cost. Die and Mould Technology, 2006, 5(6): 57-60. (in Chinese)
[4] https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol/what-isthe-kyoto-protocol/what-is-the-kyoto-protocol /(accessed on 24 May 2019).
[5] R Huang, M Riddle, D Graziano, et al. Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 1559-1570.
[6] R Li, Q Zhang, X Zhang, et al. Control method for steel strip roughness in Two-stand temper mill rolling. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 28(3): 573-579.
[7] D B Tang, M Dai. Energy-efcient approach to minimizing the energy consumption in an extended job-shop scheduling problem. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 28(5): 1048-1055.
[8] G Campatelli, L Lorenzini, A Scippa. Optimization of process parameters using a Response Surface Method for minimizing power consumption in the milling of carbon steel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 66(2): 309-316.
[9] J Wójcicki, M Leonesio, G Bianchi, et al. Integrated energy analysis of cutting process and spindle subsystem in a turning machine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 1459-1472.
[10] Q Zhong, R Tang, T Peng. Decision rules for energy consumption minimization during material removal process in turning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 140: 1819-1827.
[11] P S Bilga, S Singh, R Kumar. Optimization of energy consumption response parameters for turning operation using Taguchi method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137: 1406-1417.
[12] B Wang, Z Liu, Q Song, et al. Proper selection of cutting parameters and cutting tool angle to lower the specifc cutting energy during high speed machining of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 129: 292-304.
[13] Q Wang, F Liu, X Wang. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters considering energy consumption. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 71(5-8): 1133-1142.
[14] Q Yi, C Li, Y Tang, et al. Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC machining for low carbon manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 95: 256-264.
[15] Z J Liu, D P Sun, C X Lin, et al. Multi-objective optimization of the operating conditions in a cutting process based on low carbon emission processing times. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 124: 266-275.
[16] K He, R Tang, M Jin. Pareto fronts of cutting parameters for trade-of among energy consumption, cutting force and processing time. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 185: 113-127.
[17] S A Bagaber, A R Yusof. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters to minimize power consumption in dry turning of stainless steel 316. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 157: 30-46.
[18] W W Lin, D Y Yu, et al. Multi-objective teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm for reducing carbon emission and operation processing time in turning operations. Engineering Optimization, 2015, 47(7): 994-1007.
[19] C Camposeco-Negrete. Optimization of cutting parameters using Response Surface Method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 91: 109-117.
[20] W W Lin, D Y Yu, C Y Zhang, et al. Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters in multi-pass turning operations for low-carbon manufacturing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2017, 231(13): 2372-2383.
[21] Ic Yusuf Tansel, Saraloğlu Güler Ebru, Cabbaroğlu Ceren, et al. Optimisation of cutting parameters for minimizing carbon emission and maximising cutting quality in turning process. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(11): 1-21.
[22] C Li, Q Xiao, Y Tang, et al. A method integrating Taguchi, RSM and MOPSO to CNC cutting parameters optimization for energy saving. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 263-275.
[23] Y Zhang, Q Liu, Y Zhou. Integrated optimization of cutting parameters and scheduling for reducing carbon emission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 53(5): 886-895.
[24] F Ma, H Zhang, H J Cao, Multi-objective cutting parameters optimization for low energy and minimum cutting fuid consumption. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(11): 157-163. (in Chinese)
[25] C B Li. Multi-objective NC cutting parameters optimization model for high efciency and low carbon. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(9): 87-96. (in Chinese)
[26] Z P Jiang, D Gao, Y Lu, et al. Electrical energy consumption of CNC machine tools based on empirical modeling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2808-x.
[27] Z H Zhou. Metal cutting theory. Shanghai Scientifc and Technical Publishers, 1984. (in Chinese)
[28] S Kalpakjian, S R Schmid. Manufacturing engineering and technology: machining. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2006.
[29] E Oberg, F D Jones, H L Horton. Machinery's Handbook. 26th ed. New York: Industrial Press Inc., 2000.
[30] K Deb, A Pratap, S Agarwal, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
[31] G Box. Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations. Technometrics, 1988, 30(1): 1-17.
