Intelligent Manufacturing Technology

Influence of Cavitation on Unsteady Vortical Flows in a Side Channel Pump

  • Yefang Wang ,
  • Fan Zhang ,
  • Shouqi Yuan ,
  • Ke Chen ,
  • Feng Hong ,
  • Desmond Appiah
展开
  • 1. National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China;
    2. College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China

收稿日期: 2021-04-11

  修回日期: 2022-07-12

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-20

基金资助

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52279086) and Yunnan Provincial Ranking the Top of the List for Science and Technology Projects of China (Grant No. 202204BW050001)

Influence of Cavitation on Unsteady Vortical Flows in a Side Channel Pump

  • Yefang Wang ,
  • Fan Zhang ,
  • Shouqi Yuan ,
  • Ke Chen ,
  • Feng Hong ,
  • Desmond Appiah
Expand
  • 1. National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China;
    2. College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China

Received date: 2021-04-11

  Revised date: 2022-07-12

  Online published: 2023-12-20

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52279086) and Yunnan Provincial Ranking the Top of the List for Science and Technology Projects of China (Grant No. 202204BW050001)

摘要

Previous investigation on side channel pump mainly concentrates on parameter optimization and internal unsteady vortical flows. However, cavitation is prone to occur in a side channel pump, which is a challenging issue in promoting performance. In the present study, the cavitating flow is investigated numerically by the turbulence model of SAS combined with the Zwart cavitation model. The vapors inside the side channel pump firstly occur in the impeller passage near the inlet and then spread gradually to the downstream passages with the decrease of NPSHa. Moreover, a strong adverse pressure gradient is presented at the end of the cavity closure region, which leads to cavity shedding from the wall. The small scaled vortices in each passage reduce significantly and gather into larger vortices due to the cavitation. Comparing the three terms of vorticity transport equation with the vapor volume fraction and vorticity distributions, it is found that the stretching term is dominant and responsible for the vorticity production and evolution in cavitating flows. In addition, the magnitudes of the stretching term decrease once the cavitation occurs, while the values of dilatation are high in the cavity region and increase with the decreasing NPSHa. Even though the magnitude of the baroclinic torque term is smaller than vortex stretching and dilatation terms, it is important for the vorticity production along the cavity surface and near the cavity closure region. The pressure fluctuations in the impeller and side channel tend to be stronger due to the cavitation. The primary frequency of monitor points in the impeller is 24.94 Hz and in the side channel is 598.05 Hz. They are quite corresponding to the shaft frequency of 25 Hz (fshaft = 1/n = 25 Hz) and the blade frequency of 600 Hz (fblade = Z/n =600 Hz) respectively. This study complements the investigation on cavitation in the side channel pump, which could provide the theoretical foundation for further optimization of performance.

本文引用格式

Yefang Wang , Fan Zhang , Shouqi Yuan , Ke Chen , Feng Hong , Desmond Appiah . Influence of Cavitation on Unsteady Vortical Flows in a Side Channel Pump[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023 , 36(1) : 25 -25 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-023-00842-4

Abstract

Previous investigation on side channel pump mainly concentrates on parameter optimization and internal unsteady vortical flows. However, cavitation is prone to occur in a side channel pump, which is a challenging issue in promoting performance. In the present study, the cavitating flow is investigated numerically by the turbulence model of SAS combined with the Zwart cavitation model. The vapors inside the side channel pump firstly occur in the impeller passage near the inlet and then spread gradually to the downstream passages with the decrease of NPSHa. Moreover, a strong adverse pressure gradient is presented at the end of the cavity closure region, which leads to cavity shedding from the wall. The small scaled vortices in each passage reduce significantly and gather into larger vortices due to the cavitation. Comparing the three terms of vorticity transport equation with the vapor volume fraction and vorticity distributions, it is found that the stretching term is dominant and responsible for the vorticity production and evolution in cavitating flows. In addition, the magnitudes of the stretching term decrease once the cavitation occurs, while the values of dilatation are high in the cavity region and increase with the decreasing NPSHa. Even though the magnitude of the baroclinic torque term is smaller than vortex stretching and dilatation terms, it is important for the vorticity production along the cavity surface and near the cavity closure region. The pressure fluctuations in the impeller and side channel tend to be stronger due to the cavitation. The primary frequency of monitor points in the impeller is 24.94 Hz and in the side channel is 598.05 Hz. They are quite corresponding to the shaft frequency of 25 Hz (fshaft = 1/n = 25 Hz) and the blade frequency of 600 Hz (fblade = Z/n =600 Hz) respectively. This study complements the investigation on cavitation in the side channel pump, which could provide the theoretical foundation for further optimization of performance.

参考文献

[1] T Meakhail, M El-sallak, M A Serag-Eldin, et al. Effect of guide blades fixed in the side channel on performance of peripheral pumps. Cairo: Cairo University, 1996.
[2] J W Song, A Engeda, M K Chung. A modified theory for the flow mechanism in a regenerative flow pump. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2003, 217(3): 311-321.
[3] M Böhle, T Müller. Evaluation of the flow inside a side channel pump by the application of an analytical model and CFD. Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 2009, 43727: 11–18.
[4] F Zhang, D Appiah, K Chen, et al. Dynamic characterization of vortex structures and their evolution mechanisms in a side channel pump. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(11): 111502.
[5] F Zhang, K Chen, D Appiah, et al. Description of unsteady flow characteristics in a side channel pump with a convex blade. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2021, 143(4): 041201.
[6] S S Yang, F Y Kong, X Y Qu, et al. Influence of blade number on the performance and pressure pulsations in a pump used as a turbine. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2012, 134(12).
[7] C E Brennen. A review of the dynamics of cavitating pumps. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2013, 135(6).
[8] Y X Fu, J P Yuan, S Q Yuan, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of flow phenomena in a centrifugal pump operating under low flow rates. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2015, 137(1).
[9] G C Lu, Z G Zuo, Y K Sun, et al. Experimental evidence of cavitation influences on the positive slope on the pump performance curve of a low specific speed model pump-turbine. Renewable Energy, 2017, 113: 1539-1550.
[10] O Coutier-Delgosha, J L Reboud, Y Delannoy. Numerical simulation of the unsteady behaviour of cavitating flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2003, 42(5): 519-530.
[11] L Tan, B S Zhu, S L Cao, et al. Cavitation flow simulation for a centrifugal pump at a low flow rate. Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(8): 949-952.
[12] M Ennouri, H Kanfoudi, A B Taher, et al. Numerical flow simulation and cavitation prediction in a centrifugal pump using an SST-SAS turbulence model. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 12(1): 25-39.
[13] R F Kunz, D A Boger, D R Stinebring, et al. A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Computers & Fluids, 2000, 29(8): 849-875.
[14] G H Schnerr, J Sauer. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. Proceedings of ICMF 2001 International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, USA, 2001: 1-8.
[15] P Zwart, A G Gerber, T Belamri. A two-phase model for predicting cavitation dynamics. Proceedings of ICMF 2004 International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, 2004: 1–11.
[16] A K Singhal, M M Athavale, H Y Li, et al. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124(3): 617-624.
[17] H L Liu, D X Liu, Y Wang, et al. Applicative evaluation of three cavitating models on cavitating flow calculation in centrifugal pump. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(16): 54-59.
[18] G J Zhang, W D Shi, D S Zhang, et al. A hybrid RANS/LES model for simulating time-dependent cloud cavitating flow around a NACA66 hydrofoil. Science China Technological Sciences, 2016, 59(8): 1252-1264.
[19] R E Arndt. Cavitation in vortical flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 34(1): 143-175.
[20] B Ji, X W Luo, R E Arndt, et al. Numerical simulation of three dimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation–vortex interaction. Ocean Engineering, 2014: 64-77.
[21] B Ji, X W Luo, R E Arndt, et al. Large eddy simulation and theoretical investigations of the transient cavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68(68): 121-134.
[22] Y Chen, J Li, Z X Gong, et al. Large eddy simulation and investigation on the laminar-turbulent transition and turbulence-cavitation interaction in the cavitating flow around hydrofoil. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018: 300-322.
[23] H Y Cheng, X R Bai, X P Long, et al. Large eddy simulation of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, 77: 788-809.
[24] Y N Zhang, K H Liu, H Z Xian, et al. A review of methods for vortex identification in hydroturbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 81(1): 1269–1285.
[25] Q Wu, Y N Wang, G Y Wang, et al. Experimental investigation of cavitating flow-induced vibration of hydrofoils. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 144(1): 50-60.
[26] S Fleder. Mehrphasenströmung von gas-wasser-gemischen und instationäre vorgänge bei kavitation in seitenkanalpumpen. Germany: TU Kaiserslautern, Dissertation, 2017.
[27] Y F Wang, F Zhang, S Q Yuan, et al. Effect of URANS and hybrid RANS-LES turbulence models on unsteady turbulent flows inside a side channel pump. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(6): 061503.
[28] F R Menter, Y Egorov. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2010, 85(1): 113-138.
[29] B Chaouat. The state of the art of hybrid RANS/LES modeling for the simulation of turbulent flows. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2017, 99(2): 279-327.
[30] D S Zhang, L Shi, R J Zhao, et al. Study on unsteady tip leakage vortex cavitation in an axial-flow pump using an improved filter-based model. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2017, 31(2): 659-667.
[31] F Zhang, D Appiah, F Hong, et al. Energy loss evaluation in a side channel pump under different wrapping angles using entropy production method. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, (113): 104526.
[32] B Huang, Y Zhao, G Y Wang, et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent vortex-cavitation interactions in transient sheet/cloud cavitating flows. Computers and Fluids, 2014: 113–124.
[33] B Belahadji, J P Franc, J M Michel. Cavitation in the rotational structures of a turbulent wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995: 383–403.
[34] N Dittakavi, A Chunekar, S Frankel. Large eddy simulation of turbulent-cavitation interactions in a venturi nozzle. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(12).
[35] S B Pope. Turbulent flows. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
文章导航

/