Advanced Transportation Equipment

A Comparative Study of Fractional Order Models on State of Charge Estimation for Lithium Ion Batteries

  • Jinpeng Tian ,
  • Rui Xiong ,
  • Weixiang Shen ,
  • Ju Wang
展开
  • 1. Department of Vehicle Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia

收稿日期: 2020-04-17

  修回日期: 2020-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-06

基金资助

Supported by Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 3182035) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51877009)

A Comparative Study of Fractional Order Models on State of Charge Estimation for Lithium Ion Batteries

  • Jinpeng Tian ,
  • Rui Xiong ,
  • Weixiang Shen ,
  • Ju Wang
Expand
  • 1. Department of Vehicle Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia

Received date: 2020-04-17

  Revised date: 2020-06-23

  Online published: 2020-11-06

Supported by

Supported by Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 3182035) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51877009)

摘要

State of charge (SOC) estimation for lithium ion batteries plays a critical role in battery management systems for electric vehicles. Battery fractional order models (FOMs) which come from frequency-domain modelling have provided a distinct insight into SOC estimation. In this article, we compare fve state-of-the-art FOMs in terms of SOC estimation. To this end, frstly, characterisation tests on lithium ion batteries are conducted, and the experimental results are used to identify FOM parameters. Parameter identifcation results show that increasing the complexity of FOMs cannot always improve accuracy. The model R(RQ)W shows superior identifcation accuracy than the other four FOMs. Secondly, the SOC estimation based on a fractional order unscented Kalman flter is conducted to compare model accuracy and computational burden under diferent profles, memory lengths, ambient temperatures, cells and voltage/current drifts. The evaluation results reveal that the SOC estimation accuracy does not necessarily positively correlate to the complexity of FOMs. Although more complex models can have better robustness against temperature variation, R(RQ), the simplest FOM, can overall provide satisfactory accuracy. Validation results on diferent cells demonstrate the generalisation ability of FOMs, and R(RQ) outperforms other models. Moreover, R(RQ) shows better robustness against truncation error and can maintain high accuracy even under the occurrence of current or voltage sensor drift.

本文引用格式

Jinpeng Tian , Rui Xiong , Weixiang Shen , Ju Wang . A Comparative Study of Fractional Order Models on State of Charge Estimation for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020 , 33(4) : 51 -51 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-020-00467-x

Abstract

State of charge (SOC) estimation for lithium ion batteries plays a critical role in battery management systems for electric vehicles. Battery fractional order models (FOMs) which come from frequency-domain modelling have provided a distinct insight into SOC estimation. In this article, we compare fve state-of-the-art FOMs in terms of SOC estimation. To this end, frstly, characterisation tests on lithium ion batteries are conducted, and the experimental results are used to identify FOM parameters. Parameter identifcation results show that increasing the complexity of FOMs cannot always improve accuracy. The model R(RQ)W shows superior identifcation accuracy than the other four FOMs. Secondly, the SOC estimation based on a fractional order unscented Kalman flter is conducted to compare model accuracy and computational burden under diferent profles, memory lengths, ambient temperatures, cells and voltage/current drifts. The evaluation results reveal that the SOC estimation accuracy does not necessarily positively correlate to the complexity of FOMs. Although more complex models can have better robustness against temperature variation, R(RQ), the simplest FOM, can overall provide satisfactory accuracy. Validation results on diferent cells demonstrate the generalisation ability of FOMs, and R(RQ) outperforms other models. Moreover, R(RQ) shows better robustness against truncation error and can maintain high accuracy even under the occurrence of current or voltage sensor drift.

参考文献

[1] M A Hannan, M S H Lipu, A Hussain, et al. A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 78: 834-854.
[2] W Wang, Y Li, C Lin, et al. Mass-spring-damping theory based equivalent mechanical model for cylindrical lithium-ion batteries under mechanical abuse. Chinese J. Mech. Eng, 2020, 33:23.
[3] Y Sun, Z Ma, G Tang, et al. Estimation method of state-of-charge for lithium-ion battery used in hybrid electric vehicles based on variable structure extended Kalman filter. Chinese J. Mech. Eng, 2016, 29(4): 717-726.
[4] Y Zheng, M Ouyang, X Han, et al. Investigating the error sources of the online state of charge estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources, 2018, 377: 161-188.
[5] M Doyle, T F Fuller, J S Newman. Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc, 1993, 140(6): 1526-1533.
[6] T F Fuller, M Doyle, J Newman. Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium ion insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc, 1994, 141(1): 1-10.
[7] X Kong, G L Plett, M S Trimboli, et al. Pseudo-two-dimensional model and impedance diagnosis of micro internal short circuit in lithium-ion cells. J. Energy Storage, 2020, 27: 101085.
[8] R Xiong, S Ma, H Li, et al. Toward a safer battery management system: A critical review on diagnosis and prognosis of battery short circuit. iScience, 2020, 23(4): 101010.
[9] M R Palacín. Understanding ageing in Li-ion batteries: A chemical issue. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47(13): 4924-4933.
[10] J Tian, R Xiong, W Shen. A review on state of health estimation for lithium ion batteries in photovoltaic systems. eTransportation, 2019, 2: 100028.
[11] R Xiong, Y Zhang, J Wang, et al. Lithium-ion battery health prognosis based on a real battery management system used in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, 2019, 68(5): 4110-4121.
[12] P Amiribavandpour, W Shen, D Mu, et al. An improved theoretical electrochemical-thermal modelling of lithium-ion battery packs in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources, 2015, 284: 328-338.
[13] C Lin, A Tang. Simplification and efficient simulation of electrochemical model for li-ion battery in EVs. Energy Procedia, 2016, 104: 68-73.
[14] R Xiong, J Tian, H Mu, et al. A systematic model-based degradation behavior recognition and health monitoring method for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Energy, 2017, 207: 372-383.
[15] P Shrivastava, T Kok, M Yamani, et al. Overview of model-based online state-of-charge estimation using Kalman filter family for lithium-ion batteries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2019, 113: 109233.
[16] Y Zheng, W Gao, X Han, et al. An accurate parameters extraction method for a novel on-board battery model considering electrochemical properties. J. Energy Storage, 2019, 24: 100745.
[17] R Xiong, Q Yu, W Shen, et al. A sensor fault diagnosis method for a lithium-ion battery pack in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 2019, 34(10): 9709-9718.
[18] R Xiong, R Yang, Z Chen, et al. Online fault diagnosis of external short circuit for lithium-ion battery pack. IEEE Trans.Ind.Electron, 2020, 67(2): 1081-1091.
[19] H He, R Xiong, J Fan. Evaluation of lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit models for state of charge estimation by an experimental approach. Energies, 2011, 4(4): 582-598.
[20] X Lai, Y Zheng, T Sun. A comparative study of different equivalent circuit models for estimating state-of-charge of lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 259: 566-577.
[21] J Huang, Z Li, B Y Liaw, et al. Graphical analysis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data in Bode and Nyquist representations. J. Power Sources, 2016, 309: 82-98.
[22] H Qu, J Kafle, J Harris, et al. Application of ac impedance as diagnostic tool - Low temperature electrolyte for a Li-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 322: 134755.
[23] T Osaka, D Mukoyama, H Nara. Review-development of diagnostic process for commercially available batteries, especially lithium ion battery, by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc, 2015, 162(14): A2529-A2537.
[24] S Guo, R Xiong, W Shen, et al. Aging investigation of an echelon internal heating method on a three-electrode lithium ion cell at low temperatures. J. Energy Storage, 2019, 25(5): 100878.
[25] H Ge, J Huang, J Zhang, et al. Temperature-adaptive alternating current preheating of lithium-ion batteries with lithium deposition prevention. J. Electrochem. Soc, 2016, 163(2): A290-A299.
[26] B Hirschorn, M E Orazem, B Tribollet, et al. Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55(21): 6218-6227.
[27] J Huang, H Ge, Z Li, J Zhang. Dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of a three-electrode lithium-ion battery during pulse charge and discharge. Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 176: 311-320.
[28] X Lu, H Li, N Chen. An indicator for the electrode aging of lithium-ion batteries using a fractional variable order model. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 299: 378-387.
[29] D Andre, M Meiler, K Steiner, et al. Characterization of high-power lithium-ion batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Ⅱ: Modelling. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196(12): 5349-5356.
[30] M Hu, Y Li, S Li, et al. Lithium-ion battery modeling and parameter identification based on fractional theory. Energy, 2018, 165: 153-163.
[31] S Li, M Hu, Y Li, et al. Fractional-order modeling and SOC estimation of lithium-ion battery considering capacity loss. Int. J. Energy Res., 2019, 43(1): 417-429.
[32] J Xu, C C Mi, B Cao, et al. A new method to estimate the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries based on the battery impedance model. J. Power Sources, 2013, 233: 277-284.
[33] C Liu, W Liu, L Wang, et al. A new method of modeling and state of charge estimation of the battery. J. Power Sources, 2016, 320: 1-12.
[34] C Zou, X Hu, S Dey, et al. Nonlinear fractional-order estimator with guaranteed robustness and stability for lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2017, 65(7): 5951-5961.
[35] R Xiong, J Tian. A comparative study on fractional order models for voltage simulation of lithium ion batteries. IEEE 89th Veh. Technol. Conf., IEEE, 2019: 1-5.
[36] R Yang, R Xiong, H He, et al. A fractional-order model-based battery external short circuit fault diagnosis approach for all-climate electric vehicles application. J. Clean. Prod, 2018, 187: 950-959.
[37] Q Yang, J Xu, B Cao, et al. A simplified fractional order impedance model and parameter identification method for lithium-ion batteries. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): 1-13.
[38] X Hu, H Yuan, C Zou, et al. Co-estimation of state of charge and state of health for lithium-ion batteries based on fractional-order calculus. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, 2018, 67(11): 10319-10329.
[39] Y Chen, D Huang, Q Zhu, et al. A new state of charge estimation algorithm for lithium-ion batteries based on the fractional unscented Kalman filter. Energies, 2017, 10(9): 1313.
[40] B Wang, Z Liu, S E Li, et al. State-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on a nonlinear fractional model. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2017, 25(1): 3-11.
[41] J Tian, R Xiong, Q Yu. Fractional-order model-based incremental capacity analysis for degradation state recognition of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2019, 66: 1576-1584.
[42] Y Zou, S E Li, B Shao, et al. State-space model with non-integer order derivatives for lithium-ion battery. Appl. Energy, 2016, 161: 330-336.
[43] L De Sutter, Y Firouz, J De Hoog, et al. Battery aging assessment and parametric study of lithium-ion batteries by means of a fractional differential model. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 305: 24-36.
[44] Y Jiang, B Xia, X Zhao, et al. Data-based fractional differential models for non-linear dynamic modeling of a lithium-ion battery. Energy, 2017, 135: 171-181.
[45] H Mu, R Xiong, H Zheng, et al. A novel fractional order model based state-of-charge estimation method for lithium-ion battery. Appl. Energy, 2017, 207: 384-393.
[46] J Peng, J Luo, H He, et al. An improved state of charge estimation method based on cubature Kalman filter for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Energy, 2019, 253: 113520.
[47] I Petráš. Fractional-order nonlinear systems: modeling, analysis and simulation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
[48] Q Yu, R Xiong, L Y Wang, et al. A comparative study on open circuit voltage models for lithium-ion batteries. Chinese J. Mech. Eng., 2018, 31: 65.
[49] R Xiong, J Tian, W Shen, et al. A novel fractional order model for state of charge estimation in lithium ion batteries. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2019, 68(5): 4130-4139.
[50] R Caballero-Águila, A Hermoso-Carazo, J Linares-Pérez. Extended and unscented filtering algorithms in nonlinear fractional order systems with uncertain observations. Appl. Math. Sci., 2012, 6: 1471-1486.
[51] C Chen, R Xiong, R Yang, et al. State-of-charge estimation of Lithium-ion battery using an improved neural network model and extended Kalman filter. J. Clean. Prod, 2019, 234: 1153-1164.
[52] X Liu, Z Chen, C Zhang, et al. A novel temperature-compensated model for power Li-ion batteries with dual-particle-filter state of charge estimation. Appl. Energy, 2014, 123: 263-272.
[53] Y Zheng, M Ouyang, L Lu, et al. Cell state-of-charge inconsistency estimation for LiFePO4 battery pack in hybrid electric vehicles using mean-difference model. Appl. Energy, 2013, 111: 571– 580.
[54] L Lu, X Han, J Li, et al. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources, 2013, 226: 272–288.
文章导航

/