高性能焊接与评价

基于单边缺口拉伸试样的环缝接头阻力曲线确定方法对比

  • 龚宝明 ,
  • 田润明 ,
  • 刘秀国 ,
  • 邓彩艳 ,
  • 王东坡
展开
  • 1. 天津大学, 天津, 300072;
    2. 天津市现代连接技术重点实验室, 天津, 300072
龚宝明,博士,副教授,博士研究生导师;主要从事断裂力学及结构尺度效应的研究,金属材料及焊接接头的超长疲劳寿命研究以及含缺陷结构完整性评估技术及应用(ECA)等工作;Email: gongbm@tju.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2021-06-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-07-14

基金资助

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFC0310306);国家自然科学基金资助项目(52075366)

Comparative study on determination methods of resistance curves of circular joints based on single edge notched tensile specimens

  • GONG Baoming ,
  • TIAN Runming ,
  • LIU Xiuguo ,
  • DENG Caiyan ,
  • WANG Dongpo
Expand
  • 1. Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China;
    2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology, Tianjin, 300072, China

Received date: 2021-06-10

  Online published: 2022-07-14

摘要

近些年单边缺口拉伸(SENT)试样被用于管道基于应变的设计与评估,并且相关机构发展了一些断裂韧性的测试标准,包括DNVGL-RP-F108,CANMET,BMT,USP以及英国国家标准BS 8571等. 但相关测试标准之间在测试原理、测试方法以及断裂韧性计算方法上还存在较大差异,有必要对它们之间的区别进行进一步的研究. 文中以API X80管线钢环缝接头为研究对象,对夹持式单边缺口拉伸(SENT)试样的裂纹尖端张开位移(δ)和J积分阻力曲线不同确定方法进行了对比. 结果表明,通过拟合计算J-R曲线、δ-R曲线以及初始断裂韧性值J0.2δ0.2,给出了SENT试样断裂韧性阻力曲线计算的推荐公式.

本文引用格式

龚宝明 , 田润明 , 刘秀国 , 邓彩艳 , 王东坡 . 基于单边缺口拉伸试样的环缝接头阻力曲线确定方法对比[J]. 焊接学报, 2022 , 43(5) : 21 -28 . DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20210610001

Abstract

In recent years, single edge notched tension (SENT) specimens have been used for strain-based design and evaluation of pipelines, and several fracture toughness testing standards have been developed, including DNVGL-RP-F108, CANMET, BMT, USP and BS 8571. However, there are still great differences between relevant test standards in test principles, test methods and calculation methods of fracture toughness. It is necessary to further study the differences between them. Therefore, different determination methods of crack tip opening displacement (δ) and J-integral resistance curves for clamped SENT specimens of API X80 pipeline girth weld joints were compared. By fitting the J-R curves, δ-R curves and initial fracture toughness values J0.2 and δ0.2, the recommended equations for the fracture toughness resistance curve of SENT specimens were given.

参考文献

[1] Yin Xiaohui, He Guoqiang, Liu Sihan, et al. Effect of welding pressure on mechanical properties of resistance spot welding joint[J]. China Welding, 2020, 29(3): 33 ? 38.
[2] 李一哲, 王东坡, 邓彩艳, 等. 单边缺口拉伸试样的断裂韧性计算方法对比[J]. 焊接学报, 2017, 38(4): 59 ? 62
Li Yizhe, Wang Dongpo, Deng Caiyan, et al. Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2017, 38(4): 59 ? 62
[3] Zhu X K. Progress in development of fracture toughness test methods for SENT specimens[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2017, 156: 40 ? 58.
[4] Zhu X K, Joyce J A. Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 85: 1 ? 46.
[5] DNV Recommended Practice DNVGL-RP-F108. Fracture control for pipeline installation methods introducing cyclic plastic strain[S]. Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2006.
[6] Park D Y, Tyson W R, Gravel J P. CANMET SENT test method, updates and applications[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2017, 156(2): 8 ? 16.
[7] Cravero S, Ruggieri C. Estimation procedure of J-resistance curves for SE(T) fracture specimens using unloading compliance[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 74(17): 35 ? 57.
[8] Mathias L L S, Sarzosa D F B, Ruggieri C. Effects of specimen geometry and loading mode on crack growth resistance curves of a high-strength pipeline girth weld[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2013, 111: 106 ? 119.
[9] ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company. Measurement of crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) fracture resistance curves using single-edge notched tension (SENT) specimens[S]. America: ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, 2010.
[10] Kang J, Gianetto J A, Tyson W R. Recent development in low-constraint fracture toughness testing for structural integrity assessment of pipelines[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(4): 546 ? 553.
[11] Bristish Standards Institution . Method of test for determination of fracture toughness in metallic materials using single edge notched tension (SENT) specimens ,BS 8571.[S]. London: Bristish Standards Institution, 2014.
[12] BMT Fleet Technology. Measurement of crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) and J-fracture resistance curves using single-edge notched tension (SENT) specimens[S]. British: BMT Fleet Technology, 2013.
[13] Shen G, Gianetto J A, Tyson W R. Measurement of J-R curves using single-specimen technique on clamped SE(T) specimens[C]//Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Osaka: CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory. 2009: 92−99.
[14] Shen G, Gianetto J A, Tyson W R. Development of procedure for low-constraint toughness testing using a single-specimen technique[R]. Canada: CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory, 2008.
[15] Zhu Xiankui , Paul Zelenak, Tom McGaughy. Comparative study of CTOD-resistance curve test methods for SENT specimens[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2017, 172: 17 ? 38.
[16] Sarzosa D F B, Ruggieri C. Relationship between J and CTOD in SE(T) and SE(B) specimens for stationary and growing cracks[C]//International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014: 1 −11.
[17] Sarzosa D F B, Souza R F, Ruggieri C. J-CTOD relations in clamped SE(T) fracture specimens including 3D stationary and growth analysis[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2015, 147: 331 ? 354.
文章导航

/