研究论文

基于动态权重的自适应PSO-BP神经网络焊接缺陷成因诊断

  • 高昶霖 ,
  • 宋燕利 ,
  • 左洪洲 ,
  • 章诚
展开
  • 1. 武汉理工大学, 现代汽车零部件技术湖北省重点实验室, 武汉, 430070;
    2. 武汉理工大学, 汽车零部件技术湖北省协同创新中心, 武汉, 430070;
    3. 武汉理工大学, 湖北省材料绿色精密成形工程技术研究中心, 武汉, 430070;
    4. 湖北省齐星汽车车身股份有限公司, 随州, 441300
高昶霖,硕士研究生;主要研究方向为专家系统、智能制造;Email:506070302@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-05-15

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-18

基金资助

湖北省技术创新专项(2019AAA014);湖北省重点研发计划项目(2020BAB143);新能源汽车科学与关键技术学科创新引智基地(B17034);教育部创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT_17R83)

Cause diagnosis of welding defects based on adaptive PSO-BP neural network with dynamic weighting

  • GAO Changlin ,
  • SONG Yanli ,
  • ZUO Hongzhou ,
  • ZHANG Cheng
Expand
  • 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China;
    2. Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China;
    3. Hubei Engineering Research Center for Green & Precision Material Forming, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China;
    4. Hubei Qixing Automobile Body Co., Ltd., Suizhou, 441300, China

Received date: 2021-05-15

  Online published: 2022-04-18

摘要

焊接缺陷产生原因复杂,影响因素众多,基于人工智能的缺陷成因诊断算法成为焊接智能化的发展方向. 将PSO-BP神经网络应用于焊接缺陷成因诊断,利用神经网络的连接学习机制代替传统专家系统的规则推理机制,并对PSO算法进行自适应调整,引入动态权重因子,搭建自适应PSO-BP神经网络模型. 结果表明,与传统PSO-BP神经网络模型相比,改进的PSO-BP神经网络模型训练所需要的迭代次数减少13.1%,诊断结果准确率从93.3%提高至96.7%,精确率从91.3%提高至98.3%,综合能力指标从91.7%提高至96.9%. 改进算法能够明显提升焊接缺陷成因诊断的效率和精度,具有较好的工程应用价值.

本文引用格式

高昶霖 , 宋燕利 , 左洪洲 , 章诚 . 基于动态权重的自适应PSO-BP神经网络焊接缺陷成因诊断[J]. 焊接学报, 2022 , 43(1) : 98 -106 . DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20210515001

Abstract

Considering the complex causes and various impact factors for welding defects, diagnosis methods based on artificial intelligence algorithms are regarded as one of the directions for the development of intelligentizing welding. In this study, an improved diagnosis method for welding defect based on PSO-BP neural network is proposed. Connection learning mechanism of neural network is used instead of the rule reasoning mechanism of traditional expert systems. It also makes adaptive adjustments to the PSO algorithm, introduced dynamic weight factors, and builds an adaptive PSO-BP neural network model. Compared with the traditional PSO-BP neural network model, the number of iterations required to train the improved PSO-BP neural network model reduced by 13.1%, the accuracy of diagnostic results increased from 93.3% to 96.7%, the precision increased from 91.3% to 98.3%, and the comprehensive performance index increased from 91.7% to 96.9%. The results show that the improved algorithm can significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of welding defect diagnosis, and has good engineering application value.

参考文献

[1] 吴叶军, 魏艳红. 智能化焊接CAPP的分析与开发[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(7): 109 - 112
Wu Yejun, Wei Yanhong. Analysis and development of intelligentialized welding CAPP system[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2015, 36(7): 109 - 112
[2] Tsoukalas V D, Kontesis M, Badogiannis E, et al. WELDES: An intelligent defects expert system for aluminum welding process[J]. Wseas Transactions on Information Science & Applications, 2007, 4(2): 339 - 345.
[3] 宋燕利, 余成, 戴定国, 等. 基于BP 和GA 的激光焊接热源模型参数优化[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2017, 24(1): 218 - 222
Song Yanli, Yu Cheng, Dai Dingguo, et al. Parameter optimization of heat source model for laser welding based on BP neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2017, 24(1): 218 - 222
[4] 邵晴, 于庆斌, 尹华, 等. 焊接热输入对高速动车组转向架侧梁焊接变形的影响及优化[J]. 焊接学报, 2020, 41(12): 25 - 32,48
Shao Qing, Yu Qingbin, Yin Hua, et al. Effect of welding heat input on welding deformation of bogie side beam of high-speed EMU and optimization[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2020, 41(12): 25 - 32,48
[5] Liu J, Xu G C, Ren L, et al. Defect intelligent identification in resistance spot welding ultrasonic detection based on wavelet packet and neural network[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 90(9-12): 2581 - 2588.
[6] Li Z K, Zhao X H. BP artificial neural network based wave front correction for sensor-less free space optics communication[J]. Optics Communications, 2017, 385: 219 - 228.
[7] 刘占军, 单宝峰, 贺平. 小波神经网络在铝合金焊接缺陷诊断中的研究[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2005, 25(3): 219 - 221
Liu Zhanjun, Shan Baofeng, He Ping. Wavelet neural network application to diagnosing defect of aluminum alloy welding[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2005, 25(3): 219 - 221
[8] 姜洪权, 贺帅, 高建民, 等. 一种改进卷积神经网络模型的焊缝缺陷识别方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 235 - 242
Jiang Hongquan, He Shuai, Gao Jianmin, et al. An improved convolutional neural network for weld defect recognition[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(8): 235 - 242
[9] Ravi R, Aaquib R K, Chirag P, et al. Classification and identification of surface defects in friction stir welding: An image processing approach[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2016, 22: 237 - 253.
[10] Bacioiu D, Melton G, Papaelias M, et al. Automated defect classification of aluminium 5083 TIG welding using HDR camera and neural networks[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2019, 45: 603 - 613.
[11] Zhang Z, Jia L M, Qin Y. Modified constriction particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(5): 1107 - 1113.
[12] 张爱华, 高佛来, 牛小革, 等. 基于BP神经网络的钢轨闪光对焊接头灰斑面积预测[J]. 焊接学报, 2016, 37(11): 11 - 14
Zhang Aihua, Gao Folai, Niu Xiaoge, et al. Prediction of gray-spot area in rail flash butt welded joint based on BP neural network[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2016, 37(11): 11 - 14
[13] Avidan S. Ensemble tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29(2): 261 - 271.
[14] Li J Y, Men C, Qi J F, et al. Impact factor analysis, prediction, and mapping of soil corrosion of carbon steel across China based on MIV-BP artificial neural network and GIS[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(8): 3204 - 3216.
[15] 刘碧瑶. 基于BP神经网络的住院费用建模研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006.
Liu Biyao. Research of establishing hospitalization charge fitting model by using BP neural network[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006.
[16] Sheela K G, Deepa S N. Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013(6): 425740.
[17] 王东风, 孟丽. 粒子群优化算法的性能分析和参数选择[J]. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(10): 1552 - 1561
Wang Dongfeng, Meng Li. Performance analysis and parameter selection of PSO algorithms[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(10): 1552 - 1561
文章导航

/