A Stiffness Variable Passive Compliance Device with Reconfigurable Elastic Inner Skeleton and Origami Shell

  • Zhuang Zhang ,
  • Genliang Chen ,
  • Weicheng Fan ,
  • Wei Yan ,
  • Lingyu Kong ,
  • Hao Wang
展开
  • 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China;
    3. Intelligent Robot Research Center, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, 311100, China

收稿日期: 2020-01-31

  修回日期: 2020-09-03

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-14

基金资助

Supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0111300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875334), and State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) (Grant No. DMETKF2019007)

A Stiffness Variable Passive Compliance Device with Reconfigurable Elastic Inner Skeleton and Origami Shell

  • Zhuang Zhang ,
  • Genliang Chen ,
  • Weicheng Fan ,
  • Wei Yan ,
  • Lingyu Kong ,
  • Hao Wang
Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China;
    3. Intelligent Robot Research Center, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, 311100, China

Received date: 2020-01-31

  Revised date: 2020-09-03

  Online published: 2021-01-14

Supported by

Supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0111300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875334), and State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) (Grant No. DMETKF2019007)

摘要

Devices with variable stiffness are drawing more and more attention with the growing interests of human-robot interaction, wearable robotics, rehabilitation robotics, etc. In this paper, the authors report on the design, analysis and experiments of a stiffness variable passive compliant device whose structure is a combination of a reconfigurable elastic inner skeleton and an origami shell. The main concept of the reconfigurable skeleton is to have two elastic trapezoid four-bar linkages arranged in orthogonal. The stiffness variation generates from the passive deflection of the elastic limbs and is realized by actively switching the arrangement of the leaf springs and the passive joints in a fast, simple and straightforward manner. The kinetostatics and the compliance of the device are analyzed based on an efficient approach to the large deflection problem of the elastic links. A prototype is fabricated to conduct experiments for the assessment of the proposed concept. The results show that the prototype possesses relatively low stiffness under the compliant status and high stiffness under the stiff status with a status switching speed around 80 ms.

本文引用格式

Zhuang Zhang , Genliang Chen , Weicheng Fan , Wei Yan , Lingyu Kong , Hao Wang . A Stiffness Variable Passive Compliance Device with Reconfigurable Elastic Inner Skeleton and Origami Shell[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020 , 33(5) : 75 -75 . DOI: 10.1186/s10033-020-00490-y

Abstract

Devices with variable stiffness are drawing more and more attention with the growing interests of human-robot interaction, wearable robotics, rehabilitation robotics, etc. In this paper, the authors report on the design, analysis and experiments of a stiffness variable passive compliant device whose structure is a combination of a reconfigurable elastic inner skeleton and an origami shell. The main concept of the reconfigurable skeleton is to have two elastic trapezoid four-bar linkages arranged in orthogonal. The stiffness variation generates from the passive deflection of the elastic limbs and is realized by actively switching the arrangement of the leaf springs and the passive joints in a fast, simple and straightforward manner. The kinetostatics and the compliance of the device are analyzed based on an efficient approach to the large deflection problem of the elastic links. A prototype is fabricated to conduct experiments for the assessment of the proposed concept. The results show that the prototype possesses relatively low stiffness under the compliant status and high stiffness under the stiff status with a status switching speed around 80 ms.

参考文献

[1] A De Santis, B Siciliano, A De Luca, et al. An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2008, 43(3): 253-270.
[2] D E Whitney. Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1987, 6(1): 3-14.
[3] S Haddadin, A Albu-Schäffer, G Hirzinger. Requirements for safe robots: Measurements, analysis and new insights. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28(11-12): 1507-1527.
[4] W Wang, R N K Loh, E Y Gu. Passive compliance versus active compliance in robot-based automated assembly systems. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 1998, 25(1): 48-57.
[5] N Hogan, S P Buerger. Robotics and Automation Handbook. New York: CRC Press, 2004: 375–398.
[6] T Lefebvre, J Xiao, H Bruyninckx, et al. Active compliant motion: A survey. Advanced Robotics, 2005, 19(5): 479-499.
[7] K Goris, J Saldien, B Vanderborght, et al. How to achieve the huggable behavior of the social robot Probo? A reflection on the actuators. Mechatronics, 2011, 21(3): 490-500.
[8] R Van Ham, T G Sugar, B Vanderborght, et al. Compliant actuator designs. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2009, 16(3): 81-94.
[9] J J Park, J B Song. A nonlinear stiffness safe joint mechanism design for human robot interaction. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(6): 061005.
[10] D E Whitney, J M Rourke. Mechanical behavior and design equations for elastomer shear pad remote center compliances. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1986, 108(3): 223–232.
[11] Š Havlík. A new elastic structure for a compliant robot wrist. Robotica, 1983, 1(2): 95-102.
[12] N Ciblak, H Lipkin. Design and analysis of remote center of compliance structures. Journal of Robotic Systems, 2003, 20(8): 415-427.
[13] S Lee. Development of a new variable remote center compliance (VRCC) with modified elastomer shear pad (ESP) for robot assembly. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005, 2(2): 193-197.
[14] J Yu, Y Zhao, G Chen, et al. Realizing controllable physical interaction based on an electromagnetic variable stiffness joint. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2019, 11(5): 054501.
[15] P H Kuo, A D Deshpande. A novel joint design for robotic hands with humanlike nonlinear compliance. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2016, 8(2).
[16] D Shin, I Sardellitti, Y L Park, et al. Design and control of a bio-inspired human-friendly robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2010, 29(5): 571-584.
[17] T W Seo, M Sitti. Tank-like module-based climbing robot using passive compliant joints. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, 18(1): 397-408.
[18] J Choi, S Hong, W Lee, et al. A robot joint with variable stiffness using leaf springs. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2011, 27(2): 229-238.
[19] M Zhu, Y Mori, T Wakayama, et al. A fully multi-material three-dimensional printed soft gripper with variable stiffness for robust grasping. Soft Robotics, 2019, 6(4): 507-519.
[20] S Kawamura, T Yamamoto, D Ishida, et al. Development of passive elements with variable mechanical impedance for wearable robots. Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 2002, 1: 248-253.
[21] A Bamotra, P Walia, A V Prituja, et al. Layer-jamming suction grippers with variable stiffness. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2019, 11(3): 035003.
[22] T Wang, J Zhang, Y Li, et al. Electrostatic layer jamming variable stiffness for soft robotics. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(2): 424-433.
[23] Y J Kim, S Cheng, S Kim, et al. A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, 29(4): 1031-1042.
[24] Y Tao, T Wang, Y Wang, et al. A new variable stiffness robot joint. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2015, 42(4): 371-378.
[25] S Bi, C Liu, H Zhao, et al. Design and analysis of a novel variable stiffness actuator based on parallel-assembled-folded serial leaf springs. Advanced Robotics, 2017, 31(18): 990-1001.
[26] G Chen, Z Zhang, H Wang. A general approach to the large deflection problems of spatial flexible rods using principal axes decomposition of compliance matrices. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2018, 10(3): 031012.
[27] G Chen, Z Zhang, L Kong, et al. Analysis and validation of a flexible planar two degrees-of-freedom parallel manipulator with structural passive compliance. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2020, 12(1): 011011.
[28] J S Dai, M Zoppi, X Kong. Advances in reconfigurable mechanisms and robots I. London: Springer, 2012.
[29] G Wei, J S Dai, S Wang, et al. Kinematic analysis and prototype of a metamorphic anthropomorphic hand with a reconfigurable palm. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2011, 8(3): 459-479.
[30] G Wei, J S Dai. Advances in robot kinematics. Cham: Springer, 2014.
[31] Y Yoshimura. On the mechanism of buckling of a circular cylindrical shell under axial compression. Reports of the Institute of Science and Technology of the University of Tokyo, 1955.
[32] D Rus, C Sung. Spotlight on origami robots. Science Robotics, 2018, 3(15): eaat0938.
[33] G Wei, J S Dai. Origami-inspired integrated planar-spherical overconstrained mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014, 136(5): 051003.
[34] Y Chen, W Lv, R Peng, et al. Mobile assemblies of four-spherical-4R-integrated linkages and the associated four-crease-integrated rigid origami patterns. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 142: 103613.
[35] Z Zhang, G Chen, H Wu, et al. A pneumatic/cable-driven hybrid linear actuator with combined structure of origami chambers and deployable mechanism. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 3564-3571.
[36] L Paez, G Agarwal, J Paik. Design and analysis of a soft pneumatic actuator with origami shell reinforcement. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3(3): 109-119.
[37] R V Martinez, C R Fish, X Chen, et al. Elastomeric origami: programmable paper-elastomer composites as pneumatic actuators. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, 22(7): 1376-1384.
[38] M Luo, R Yan, Z Wan, et al. OriSnake: Design, fabrication, and experimental analysis of a 3-D origami snake robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 1993-1999.
[39] J Santoso, E H Skorina, M Luo, et al. Design and analysis of an origami continuum manipulation module with torsional strength. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2017: 2098-2104.
[40] K Miura, T Tachi. Synthesis of rigid-foldable cylindrical polyhedra. Symmetry: Art and Science, 2010: 204-213.
[41] G Chen, H Wang, Z Lin, et al. The principal axes decomposition of spatial stiffness matrices. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015, 31(1): 191-207.
[42] L Howell. Compliant mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
[43] G Chen, H Wang, Z Lin. Determination of the identifiable parameters in robot calibration based on the POE formula. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2014, 30(5): 1066-1077.
[44] A Bicchi, G Tonietti. Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2004, 11(2): 22-33.
文章导航

/